How do I rearrange an equation involving multiple variables and fractions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter treacleybeak
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To rearrange the equation a = bcde and isolate c, one can divide both sides by bd, resulting in c = a/(bd). Alternatively, dividing sequentially by b and then by d gives c = (a/b)/d, which can be expressed as c = a/(bd) when written in fraction form. It's crucial to note that the placement of parentheses affects the interpretation of the equation, as a/bxd is read as (a/b)xd, while a/(bxd) clarifies the intended division. Proper formatting is essential in a computer test to avoid misinterpretation of the equation. Understanding these nuances ensures accurate representation of mathematical relationships.
treacleybeak
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i have to rearrange and equation

without using the exact terms its along the lines of a = bcde and i have to make c the subject. have searched my study materiel and I am fine with multiplications etc and doing the same to both sides when doing the rearrangement ie
bcde = a
bcde divided by b = a cancel the b to get cde = a over b (as in a fraction) but how do i write the next divisions ie
cde/d = a over b cancel d to get ce = a over b but where do i put d? do i put a at the top and b and d below with a space between or do i have to write ce = a/b/d

just can't get my head round it and google brought me to you guys

help...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I will assume that none of b, d and e are zero, otherwise dividing by any of them would be a problem anyway.

If you go back to
bcde = a​
instead of first dividing by b and then by d, you can of course divide by bd. That gives you
bcde/(bd) = cde/d = bce/b = be = a/(bd).​
On the other hand, as you had reasoned already, you can first divide by b and then by d, giving be = (a/b)/d.
This shows that (a/b)/d = a / (b d).
Writing it in fractions: you can put whatever you divide by below the bar:
\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{d} = \frac{a}{b d}

Also note that (a / b) / d is something else than a / (b / d). When in doubt, you can plug in some numbers. Say a = 12, b = 6, d = 3. Then (a / b) / d = (12 / 6) / 3 = 2 / 3 while a / (b / d) = 12 / (6 / 3) = 12 / 2 = 6.
 
\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{d} = \frac{a}{b d}


but does this not indicate a/bxd?

i struggled with fractions 22 years ago at school and never thought id need to bother with them again and while i get what to do with everything else its how to write the equation correctly that's the problem as its on a computer test and if i put a space or symbol in the wrong place i don't get another chance
 
bd means b multiplied by d. It's also written as b d or b*d.
Note that, when you type a/bxd into a computer, it will usually interpret it as (a/b)xd, i.e.
\frac{a}{b} \times d

If you mean
\frac{a}{b \times d}
you should write a/(bxd)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top