How do I set up the equations for this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryuk1990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
AI Thread Summary
To find the reactions at point A, the equations for forces in both x and y directions must sum to zero, as well as the torques. The force equation in the y direction is Ay + 300 - 100 - 200 = 0, leading to Ay = 0. For the moment equation, the correct formulation includes the moment provided by the support at A, resulting in A - 100(12) + 300(15) - 200(22) = 0. This calculation yields A = 1100, confirming the need to account for all forces and moments. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving equilibrium problems effectively.
Ryuk1990
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
I am to find the reactions at A. How would I set up the equations for Ay and Ax in this problem? It seems pretty confusing. Also, will there be a momentum in this problem?

2wbt9o7.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This system is supposed to be in equilibrium, right? In that case, forces in both x and y directions must sum to 0 and torques must sum to 0. Write out those conditions in 3 equations, plug in the numbers, and you'll get the answer.
 
Well for forces in the X direction, it's just A (in the X direction) is 0, right?

For y direction, this is the equation I wrote down.

Ay + 300 - 100 - 200 = 0

Solving for the unknown, I got Ay = 0.

As for the momentum of A, here's what I wrote down. It doesn't exactly make sense to me.

-100(12) + 300(15) - 200(22) = 0

but...that comes out to -1100 = 0 which makes no sense? What's going on? Is the momentum of A just -1100?
 
Ryuk1990 said:
Well for forces in the X direction, it's just A (in the X direction) is 0, right?

For y direction, this is the equation I wrote down.

Ay + 300 - 100 - 200 = 0

Solving for the unknown, I got Ay = 0.

As for the momentum of A, here's what I wrote down. It doesn't exactly make sense to me.
You are using the wrong terminology;it's the moments (or torques) of all forces about A that must equal 0.
-100(12) + 300(15) - 200(22) = 0

but...that comes out to -1100 = 0 which makes no sense? What's going on? Is the momentum of A just -1100?
Since the support at A is fixed, it is capable of providing both forces and moment (or torque, or couple; these terms are sometimes used synonymously). So in your equation, you are missing the moment provided by the support at A.
 
PhanthomJay said:
You are using the wrong terminology;it's the moments (or torques) of all forces about A that must equal 0.Since the support at A is fixed, it is capable of providing both forces and moment (or torque, or couple; these terms are sometimes used synonymously). So in your equation, you are missing the moment provided by the support at A.

So the moment at A would be written like this?

A - 100(12) + 300(15) - 200(22) = 0

A = 1100

Also, was I right about the forces in the x and y directions?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top