How do I teach myself undergrad physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aneesh.mulye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Undergrad
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a third-year Computer Engineering student who seeks to reconnect with physics after realizing a passion for the subject. The individual has a strong mathematics background, having mastered various advanced topics, and aims to study physics independently without external support. The study plan includes reviewing basic physics, followed by classical mechanics, electrodynamics, relativity, and quantum theory.Recommendations for textbooks include Goldstein for classical mechanics and Jackson for electrodynamics, although Jackson is noted for its difficulty. Alternatives like Griffiths and Purcell are suggested for a more accessible approach. The student is encouraged to consider Landau's "Mechanics" for intuitive understanding and Feynman's "Lectures on Physics" for electrodynamics. For relativity, Wheeler and Taylor's "Spacetime Physics" is recommended, and Matthews' book is suggested for quantum mechanics.The feasibility of the study plan is affirmed, given the student's mathematical proficiency, and the importance of intuitive learning is emphasized due to the lack of a mentor.
aneesh.mulye
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Right now, I'm in the third year of my degree in Computer Engineering. Though I'm extremely fond of my subject, I've realized that for far too long, I've neglected one of my first loves - physics. I genuinely miss the fun I used to have solving complex physics problems. So now, having mastered all the mathematics that engineering has thrown at me, I'm trying to get back into the physics scene for the challenge it used to provide me with.

Thanks to the ridiculously hard engineering mathematics syllabus of our university, I can consider myself pretty proficient at whatever is needed. We are expected, in our first three semesters, to master traditional calculus on the real line including series expansions of functions, complex algebra and calculus, vector calculus, linear algebra, the solution methods for linear differential equations, Fourier analysis, the Z transform, and the Laplace transform. Hopefully this will be sufficient. If not, I'll study whatever additional mathematics is needed. As for the introductory physics needed, I've essentially covered the contents of Young and Freedman's University Physics as part of our school syllabus, so that shouldn't be a problem. I know that Resnick and Halliday is considered a more thorough treatment, so I'll check it out if necessary.

I'm looking for books which will allow me to master the traditional branches of physics at an undergraduate level (classical mechanics, including the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formalisms, classical electrodynamics, basic quantum theory, and basic relativity). However, I need books which I can use to learn on my own without any external support of any kind. I'll essentially be studying in complete isolation. I cannot approach any professor or mentor for help. The books will be my only refuge.

So are there any recommendations? The study plan goes thus: a quick review of basic school physics (Resnick and Halliday), followed by classical mechanics including the formalisms, then classical electrodynamics, then basic relativity, and finally the basics of quantum theory. I want to do mechanics and electromagnetism in their full, rigorous glory, and the latter two only for purposes of understanding the nature of the new reality.

Also - have no qualms about cost. I'm in India, and we get books very, very cheaply. For example, a book costing $150 (Principles of Mathematical Analysis) cost me less than that amount in Rupees - and a rupee is around one fiftieth of a dollar. As they are also one of the few luxuries I allow myself, I can afford to buy multiple books for the same subject and refer to different books for different topics. So feel free in recommending multiple books - I am lucky enough to be able to afford them.

Any suggestions for how to structure my study and what books to use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you aren't interested in a full, rigorous discourse on relativity or quantum mechanics, you might want to look into a book on "modern physics" (e.g. Tipler) which should cover both those topics in enough detail to be intellectually satisfying (though not complete by any stretch!)

To do mechanics in it's full rigorous glory, nothing beats Goldstein, and for rigorous E&M, absolutely nothing beats Jackson... However Jackson is quite difficult, especially for a first reading. Griffiths is a more undergraduate oriented book and is very enjoyable to read.
 
Thanks for the recommendations!

I would appreciate some further comments, however, if you have the time.

Currently, my plan goes something like this:

Review single-variable calculus, complex algebra, and linear algebra. Also review the basics of mechanics (the Y&F/RHW level) (Two months)
Review double and triple integrals, and complex and vector calculus. Simultaneously review basic E&M using the same book(s). (Two further months)
Do mechanics using Kleppner. (Three months)
Do electromagnetism using Purcell (another three months)
Then, do rigorous classical mechanics - this is where Goldstein comes in.
Finally, do rigorous E&M using either Jackson or Griffiths.

I've chosen to do Kleppner and Purcell before doing the fully rigorous treatment because I also want to develop a better intuitive understanding before jumping into full formalism.

Therefore, I must ask - do Goldstein and Jackson/Griffiths provide a good intuitive understanding of their respective subjects? I know Griffiths is pretty intuitive. However, I don't know about Goldstein or Jackson. Also, is there any "intuitionist" textbook for rigorous classical mechanics, the way there is Griffiths for E&M?

Secondly, do you think this is doable? Given that I already know all the mathematics and physics to be done in the first four months, is the idea of a review feasible? Or should I pace myself more slowly?

The reason I ask for books which will build intuition is because I'm alone - I have no teacher, no mentor. If I get stuck, I'll either have to think about it myself and solve it, or come here for help. So it would be difficult for me to learn from a book which assumes that the bulk learning will take place in the lecture hall.

Lastly - is it doable? Is it possible for a lone learner, working alone, to learn physics like this?
 
aneesh.mulye said:
Lastly - is it doable? Is it possible for a lone learner, working alone, to learn physics like this?

Yes!
 
Hi Aneesh,

Your math background is sufficient to learn all the topics you listed.

For mechanics, I recommend Lev Landau's "Mechanics" which is the first volume of his Course of Theoretical Physics. It is much much better than Goldstein, and is 1/3 the size. Lev Landau is one of the greatest physicists of the 20th century, and his books are known to be masterpieces of exposition. Full of intuition.

For electrodynamics, I recommend Richard Feynman's "Lectures on Physics", Vol II. The same comments apply to Feynman, too. He was one of the best teachers of physics, and one of the greatest physicists of the century. You may not be prepared for Jackson yet, since it's mathematically quite demanding.

For special relativity, I recommend John Wheeler and Edwin Taylor's "Spacetime Physics". It would be hard to find a better introduction than this to relativity.

For quantum mechanics, I like the book "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by P. T. Matthews. It's short and to the point, making full use of the Dirac notation. Once you read this, you'll have a good understanding of the formalism of quantum mechanics. Then you can learn about the details and applications from a bigger book such as Landau's "Quantum Mechanics".
 
aneesh.mulye said:
TDo electromagnetism using Purcell (another three months)
Then, do rigorous classical mechanics - this is where Goldstein comes in.
Finally, do rigorous E&M using either Jackson or Griffiths.

Griffiths is at more or less the same level as Purcell, i.e. undergraduate. The choice between them is a matter of personal preference. Jackson is graduate level.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
233
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Back
Top