How do I use bivectors to find the electric field in a weak magnetic field?

darida
Messages
35
Reaction score
1
Geodesic equation:

m_{0}\frac{du^{\alpha}}{d\tau}+\Gamma^{\alpha}_{\mu\nu}u^{\mu}u^{\nu}= qF^{\alpha\beta}u_{\beta}

Weak-field:

ds^{2}= - (1+2\phi)dt^{2}+(1-2\phi)(dx^{2}+dy^{2}+dz^{2})

Magnetic field, B is set to be zero.

I want to find electric field, E, but don't know where to start, so could someone give me a procedure to find it?

Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
##F_{\mu\nu}## is a covariant object but ##E^{\mu}## and ##B^{\mu}## are not i.e. they are frame dependent quantities. They only have meaning if you have a background observer with 4-velocity ##u^{\mu}## who can decompose ##F_{\mu\nu}## into ##E^{\mu}## and ##B^{\mu}## relative to ##u^{\mu}##.

Once you have such a ##u^{\mu}##, then ##E^{\mu} = F^{\mu}{}{}_{\nu}u^{\nu}## and ##B^{\mu} = -\frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\alpha\beta}u_{\nu}##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
That's not entirely true. You can build a formalism of classical electromagnetics with socalled bivectors by representing the electromagnetic field with \mathbb{C}^3 vector fields,
\vec{\mathfrak{E}}=\vec{E} + \mathrm{i} \vec{B}.
This makes use of the group-isomorphism \mathrm{SO}(1,3)^{\uparrow} \simeq \mathrm{SO}(3,\mathbb{C}).

Thus the product
\vec{\mathfrak{E}}^2=\vec{E}^2-\vec{B}^2 + 2\mathrm{i} \vec{E} \cdot \vec{B}
is Lorentz invariant wrt. to proper orthochronous Lorentz transformations, and indeed also the four-vector formalism shows that the corresponding invariants given by the real and imaginary part of the bivector scalar product are proportional to the invariants F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu} and \epsilon_{\mu \nu \rho \sigma} F^{\mu \nu} F^{\rho \sigma}=F^{\mu \nu} F^{\dagger}_{\mu \nu}.

A nice review on this funny bivector formalism can be found here:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.1218
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top