How Do KCl and NaCl Differently Affect Stomatal Opening in Plants?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rowkem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effects Kcl
AI Thread Summary
KCl and NaCl affect stomatal opening differently in plants, with KCl resulting in nearly twice as many stomata open compared to NaCl after 60 minutes. The key difference lies in the presence of K+ ions, which may create a higher osmotic potential, leading to increased water movement into guard cells and enhanced stomatal opening. The discussion highlights the selectivity of transport proteins, which are more efficient at moving potassium ions than sodium ions due to their precise geometric structure. There is speculation that plants have evolved to utilize potassium more effectively, resulting in a greater number of potassium channels compared to sodium channels. Overall, the findings suggest that potassium plays a crucial role in regulating stomatal behavior and photosynthesis in plants.
rowkem
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So we did an experiment where we put a leaf section in KCl and another leaf section in NaCl. There was a marked difference in the percent of stomata that opening between the two. We let the two sections sit in solution for 60 mins each.

The leaves in KCl had almost twice as many stoma open as the leaves in NaCl. Both were the same pH and had equal light exposure. The measurement areas were of roughly equal size.

That said, the key difference was the presence of K+ ions as opposed to Na+ ions. Now - I can't figure out why the two ions would produce such different results. Any ideas?

The Attempt at a Solution



I think it has something to do with on being positive and the other ion being negative. Though, I can't explain it in terms of the osmotic potential between the extracellular and intracellular regions, which cause the water to flow to regulate the guard cells of the stoma. Does K+ create higher osmotic potential which then means more water movies into the guard cells - thereby increasing the stomatal opening and therefore CO2 uptake, which means a higher photosynthetic rate? Or have I got this completely wrong? I've looked for lit on this topic and it's very limited, if at all existent.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


rowkem said:
I've looked for lit on this topic and it's very limited, if at all existent.

I assure you, there's plenty of literature on what potassium ions do to stomata.
 


alxm said:
I assure you, there's plenty of literature on what potassium ions do to stomata.

Yes, I realize there is much literature on what potassium does, seeing as how that's what typically moves through the transport protein. There isn't lit though, on why sodium is less effective is opening stomata.

Could it be that plants have simply evolved to use potassium, and therefore there's more transport proteins? Could it then be said that plants haven't evolved to use sodium and therefore there aren't as many transport proteins to pump the sodium into the intracellular region?

Are transport proteins that selective in the ions they move?
 


rowkem said:
Are transport proteins that selective in the ions they move?

Yes they are. K+ channels have a set of four box-shaped 'cages' stacked on top of each other, where the corner of each 'cage' is an keto-oxygen from the protein backbone. The geometry is so precise that only potassium will coordinate to all six corners, and ultimately pass through.
2zi4f8g.png


MacKinnon got the 2003 Nobel prize in Chemistry for figuring out how it worked.
 


alxm said:
Yes they are.

OK - that has help immensely. I realize now that sodium channels are highly selective and I did a quick read up on the topic. Thanks.

So - last question. Have plants evolved to have more potassium ion channels than sodium channels? If this is the case, then we can make some conclusions.
 


rowkem said:
So - last question. Have plants evolved to have more potassium ion channels than sodium channels? If this is the case, then we can make some conclusions.

I don't actually know the answer to that. But potassium is, as you see, a signalling substance. (both in plant and animal cells), so its presence is fairly tightly and actively regulated.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top