How do ladder operators generate energy values in a SHO?

maximus123
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am currently studying ladder operator for a simple harmonic operator as a method for generating the energy values. This seem like a simple algebra question I am asking so I do apologize but I just can't figure it out. Here are my operator definitions,

a_+=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(-\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+y) and a_-=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+y)​

My notes then say that

a_+a_-=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(-\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+y)\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+y)=\frac{1}{2}(-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}+y^2+1)​

I see where every resulting term comes from but it seems like there is a cross product missing, when y multiplies \frac{\partial}{\partial y} ie the second term in the left hand brackets times the first term in the right hand bracket. It seems to have multiplied to equal zero.
Could anyone explain where I'm going wrong? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I've actually just figured this out, apply the operators one at a time to an arbitrary function and this works.
 
maximus123 said:
Sorry, I've actually just figured this out, apply the operators one at a time to an arbitrary function and this works.

That's exactly right. The operators make no sense by themselves. They must be applied to a wave function. That wavefunction is often absent to reduce clutter but it really is there all the time.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top