How Do Logarithms Simplify Exponential Equations and Factor Polynomials?

Link
Messages
132
Reaction score
1
My book have a really crappy proof of how

log a^x = x log a

can be true. Can someone help me?


Another question deals with an application of it which made me really confused:

Factorise (4a^3) - (29 a^2) + 47a - 10

then solve (4*4^3x) - (29*4^2x) + 47*4^x - 10 = 0


I see many similarities between the two equations, but I don't know how to factorise polynomials. Plz help me! o:)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Link said:
My book have a really crappy proof of how

log a^x = x log a

can be true. Can someone help me?

What other elegant proof can be given,except the one which uses the definiton??

By "log" let's see a logaritm in an arbitrary base call it {b}.Since logarithm in the base "b" and the exponential "b" to the power of "x" are inverse functions,it follows simply that:

\log_{b} a^x= \log_{b} b^{(\log_{b} a)x}=x \log_{b} a


Link said:
Another question deals with an application of it which made me really confused:
Factorise (4a^3) - (29 a^2) + 47a - 10
then solve (4*4^3x) - (29*4^2x) + 47*4^x - 10 = 0
I see many similarities between the two equations, but I don't know how to factorise polynomials. Plz help me! o:)


It's not always possible to factorize polynomials,since that would require finding all solutions.And for polynomials of degree larger than 4,that is generally impossible.For your case,since it has integer cofficients,try to searc solutions among the integer divisors of the free term,which is "-10".
You'll "2" as a root for the polynomial.From there,just bu dividing the original polynomial through "a-2",u'll left with a second degree polynomial whose roots are easy to find.
From there u can factorize all the polynomial:To chech your result,i say that it looks like that:
P(a)=(a-2)(a-5)(a-\frac{1}{4})

Daniel.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top