How Do Manganese Redox Reactions Work with Nitric Acid and Potassium Iodate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mattara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions Redox
AI Thread Summary
Manganese redox reactions with nitric acid and potassium iodate involve the oxidation of manganese to Mn2+ ions and the subsequent reaction with iodate to form MnO4-. The oxidation reaction is represented as 3Mn + 6HN03 -> 6NO3- + 3Mn2+ + 6H+, but there are concerns about charge balance and the role of protons. For the second reaction, Mn2+ reacts with IO4- to yield MnO4- and I2-, with the reduction of IO4- typically resulting in IO3- under certain conditions. The discussion highlights the importance of balancing charges and understanding the behavior of iodate in redox reactions. Overall, the reactions showcase the complexity of manganese oxidation and the need for careful stoichiometric considerations.
Mattara
Messages
347
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I've been working on some redox reactions for the oxidation of manganese.

Question:

Write the complete formulae for the redox reactions below:

i.) Manganese reacts with nitric acid (V) to form Mn2+ ions.
ii.) The Mn2+ ions reacts with potassium iodate, KIO4 to form MnO4- (VII)

My Solution:

i.)

Oxidation: 3Mn (s) --> 3Mn2+ (aq) + 6e- (aq)
Reduction: 6HN03 (aq) + 6e- (aq) --> 6N03- (aq) + 6H+ (aq)
Overall reaction: 3Mn + 6HN03 -> 6NO3- + 3Mn2+ + 6H+

Is this correct? If so, does the single protons regenerate the acid and/or become attached to substances like water?

ii.)

Oxidation: Mn2+ + X -> MnO4- + ?H+
Reduction: IO4- + ?H+ -> I? + 4H2O
Overall reaction: Mn2+ + IO4- -> MnO4- + I2-

I'm having trouble with this part of the question. I does not have -II as one of its common oxidation number.

Any help or hints would be greatly appreciated :smile:

Best Regards,
Mattara
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mattara said:
Hello,

I've been working on some redox reactions for the oxidation of manganese.

Question:

Write the complete formulae for the redox reactions below:

i.) Manganese reacts with nitric acid (V) to form Mn2+ ions.
ii.) The Mn2+ ions reacts with potassium iodate, KIO4 to form MnO4- (VII)

My Solution:

i.)

Oxidation: 3Mn (s) --> 3Mn2+ (aq) + 6e- (aq)
Reduction: 6HN03 (aq) + 6e- (aq) --> 6N03- (aq) + 6H+ (aq)
Overall reaction: 3Mn + 6HN03 -> 6NO3- + 3Mn2+ + 6H+

Is this correct? If so, does the single protons regenerate the acid and/or become attached to substances like water?
Take a step back and ask yourself,

metal + acid --> salt + (?)

You do not get protons. Look at the reduction reaction you've written. The charge is not balanced. Fix that one mistake using above hint and you're good.

ii.)

Oxidation: Mn2+ + X -> MnO4- + ?H+
On the RHS, you have Mn, H and O. On the left, you have Mn. Ergo, X is simple H2O.

Reduction: IO4- + ?H+ -> I? + 4H2O
Overall reaction: Mn2+ + IO4- -> MnO4- + I2-

I'm having trouble with this part of the question. I does not have -II as one of its common oxidation number.
This is a little tricky. The reaction actually depends on the conditions. Mostly, you just have to know what happens to IO4- under different conditions. Typically, it will first get reduced to IO3-. Unless someone else suggests otherwise, you could go with that.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top