How Do NADH and NADPH Differ in Metabolism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cthor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metabolism
AI Thread Summary
NADH and NADPH serve distinct roles in metabolism, with NADH primarily involved in catabolic pathways and NADPH in anabolic pathways, particularly in the pentose phosphate pathway. Glycolysis, the citric acid cycle (CAC), and oxidative phosphorylation are interconnected, as the end product of glycolysis feeds into the CAC. Gluconeogenesis operates as the reverse of glycolysis, utilizing many of the same enzymes but with specific bypasses for two key steps. Understanding the relationships between glycolytic and gluconeogenic enzymes is essential for exam preparation. Overall, grasping these metabolic connections is crucial for mastering the subject.
cthor
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am studying for an exam tomorrow and am having a hard time understanding a couple of things.

What exactly if the difference in the chemistry and metabloic role of NADH and NADPH?

and

How are metabolic pathways (glycolysis, PPP, gluconeogenesis, citrc acid cycle, and oxid. phosphorylation) connected to each other? and what intermediates connect glycolysis to CAC and glycolysis to gluconeogenesis?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NADH is used for catabolic pathways while NADPH is used for anabolic pathways. NADPH shows up in the pentose phosphate pathway.

Glycolysis, TCA, and oxidative phosphorylation should be easy to see the connection between each other since they're usually taught as a unit. What is the finaly product of glycolysis? It's that molecule that enters the citric acid cycle. Gluconeogenesis is functionally the opposite of glycolysis and uses most of the same enzymes except for two. A typical exam question is to explain the relationship between the glycolysis enzymes and the gluconeogenesis enzymes that bypass them.
 
the way i remember the difference b/t NADH and NADPH is that NADPH is used in photosynthesis...remember the P for photosynthesis...lol just a little study tip
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top