How do pH and enzymes interact in a lab setting?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jbreezy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Enzymes Ph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interaction between pH levels and enzyme activity in a lab setting, specifically concerning an enzyme that operates optimally between pH 6.7 and 7.0. The user incorrectly calculated the pH by subtracting the normality of a solution from 7.0, suggesting a misunderstanding of how pH and enzyme activity relate. The response emphasizes that this method of calculation is flawed and encourages reviewing resources on buffers and their calculations for clarity. The importance of maintaining the correct pH for enzyme function is highlighted. Understanding buffer systems is crucial for accurate pH measurement in laboratory experiments.
Jbreezy
Messages
582
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi just a quick question. I was doing a lab report and this enzyme is supposed to work between the pH of 6.7 and 7. So I had solution of .0125 N and I said OK just subtract this from 7.0 and say that is the new Ph. So for instance 7.0 -0.125 = 6.98
I said OK this is within range so the enzyme should work. I just made this up.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This is as wrong as wrong can be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top