How do photons split into electrons and positrons?

DuckAmuck
Messages
238
Reaction score
40
I'm confused about how photons are able to split into electrons and positrons. Learning about four dimensional vectors, but it's still not clear how this happens.
The photon will have a vector of P=(E,p), where p^2=E^2, so P^2=0, since photons don't have mass.
It must be that P = P1 + P2, where P1 and P2 are electron and positron.
P1 = (E1,p1), where E1^2 = p1^2 + m^2.
So (E,p) = (E1,p1) + (E2, p2) = (E1+E2,p1+p2)
So (E,p)^2 = 0 = m^2 + m^2 + E1*E2 - p1*p2
So is the product of p1 and p2 really equal to m^2 + m^2 + E1*E2?!
That would suggest that either p1 or p2 is greater than it's corresponding energy, which would make mass negative.
What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Photons don't have mass, but they DO have momentum! ;) This is sneaky, but it comes from Special Relativistic equations. In fact, this is measurable, if you shine a light on a surface, the light will actually apply a force on that surface! F=dp/dt

check out some of these formulas:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#Physical_properties

The equation for relativistic momentum is
[URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/d/2/d/d2dec44ba56c41a31b4d334b144b51d6.png[/URL]
where
[URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/9/c/3/9c3f2777ac6cb5f4c9c1edc647c68311.png[/URL]

If v=c, such is the case for a photon, the gamma term goes to infinity, and when multiplied with zero, well, the result is not easily determinable, but it often equals a real number, such as is the case here with photons.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You are missing that for pair production to occur, another particle (usually an atomic nucleus) must be nearby to contribute momentum. Pair production does not occur in vacuum.
 
Yup. Four-momentum is not conserved in photon->electron+positron. You need another body to pick up the difference.
 
nicklaus and K^2 are correct. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production for a brief introduction. Note that it is possible for two photons to produce a pair in the absence of a massive particle. This is the reverse of anhillation.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top