How Do Potential Differences Distribute Across Series Capacitors?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the distribution of potential differences across capacitors connected in series after charging from a larger capacitor. A 2600-nF capacitor charged to 15 V is used to charge three smaller capacitors (100 nF, 200 nF, and 300 nF) in series. The initial calculations provided incorrect potential differences, prompting a review of the arithmetic involved in the series capacitance formula. The correct potential differences were identified as 14.7 V, 8.01 V, 4.01 V, and 2.67 V for the respective capacitors. The conversation highlights the importance of careful arithmetic in capacitor calculations and confirms the correct approach to analyzing charge distribution.
Renaldo
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2600-nF capacitor is disconnected from the 15-V battery and used to charge three uncharged capacitors, a 100-nF capacitor, a 200-nF capacitor, and a 300-nF capacitor, connected in series.

After charging, what is the potential difference across each of the four capacitors?


Homework Equations



Qo = CV = 3.9e-5 C

Qo = Q234C1[(1/100)+(1/200)+(1/300)] + Q234

The Attempt at a Solution



Qo = 5.33Q234

Qo = 3.9e-5 C

Q234 = 7.32e-6 C

Q1/C1 = (Qo-Q234)/C1 = [(3.9e-5 C) - (7.32e-6 C)]/2600 nF = 12.2 V

V2 = (7.32e-6 C)/100 nF = 7.32 V

V3 = (7.32e-6 C)/200 nF = 3.65 V

V4 = (7.32e-6 C)/300 nF = 2.43 V

This is incorrect, and I haven't been able to figure out what's wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In charging the others, the big capacitor loses a charge Q and drops its voltage from 15V to V.
 
I express that in this equation,

Qo = Q234C1[(1/100)+(1/200)+(1/300)] + Q234

which is derived thusly:

(Qo-Q234)/C1 = V1

Q234[(1/100)+(1/200)+(1/300)] = V234

V1 = V234

(Qo-Q234)/C1 = Q234[(1/100)+(1/200)+(1/300)]

Qo = Q234C1[(1/100)+(1/200)+(1/300)] + Q234
 
So, you can finish this now?
 
No, I cannot.

Correct answers are:
V1 = 14.7 V
V2 = 8.01 V
V3 = 4.01 V
V4 = 2.67 V

These differ from my answers in the op.
 
Your method looks right. When I finish it I get 14.692V, 8.0137V, etc.

So it looks like you may be making an arithmetic error.
 
Yes, I figured out what I was doing wrong. instead of adding [(1/100) + (1/200) + (1/300)]
I was doing 1/600. lol. Gotta be careful. Thanks for your help.
 
NascentOxygen said:
In charging the others, the big capacitor loses a charge Q and drops its voltage from 15V to V.

So is it like this:
the previous charge of the energized capacitor is used to charge other capacitors. The previous energized charge is distributed to new charge of C1 and the equal charge of the series capacitors.
Q_{\mbox{energized C1}}=Q_{\mbox{new charge of C1}}+Q_{234}
Hence the new charge is
Q_{\mbox{energized C1}}-Q_{234}=Q_{\mbox{new charge of C1}}=V_{1}C_{1}
is my analogy correct?
forgive me for hijacking but this also came up in the exam but the difference is a capacitor is charging two parallel capacitors.

I already also solved the problem in the op
Q_234 is 8.01x10^-7Coloumb btw
 
Equilibrium said:
So is it like this:
That looks right.
 
  • #10
Renaldo said:
Yes, I figured out what I was doing wrong. instead of adding [(1/100) + (1/200) + (1/300)]
I was doing 1/600. lol. Gotta be careful. Thanks for your help.
As a check, you could consider charging one capacitor of 600/11 nF, since that's the equivalent capacitance of those 3 capacitors in series.
 
Back
Top