How Do Quantum Numbers Relate to Electron Count in Quantum Dots?

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
Say we have a Quantum Dot with $$n=10^{26}m^{-3}$$ and radius $$R = 3nm$$ then this will give us of the order of 13 electrons. My question is how do you relate the number of electrons to the quantum numbers n and l in order to use the spherical Bessel function values?

In class for 13 electrons we were given $$n,l=0,2 (^{1}D)$$ which he then inserted into the formula as $$E_{0,2}= \frac{\hbar^{2} \beta_{0,2}^{2}}{2m^{*}R^{2}}$$ which is the spacing between energy levels.Just not sure how he got the n=0 l=2 and the shell 1D, any help would really be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks like an example.
At ground state, the electrons will occupy the lowest 13 states (note that you have two spin orientations). You can find allowed values of n and l in your lecture notes, book or similar.
 
  • Like
Likes rwooduk
mfb said:
That looks like an example.
At ground state, the electrons will occupy the lowest 13 states (note that you have two spin orientations). You can find allowed values of n and l in your lecture notes, book or similar.

Thanks for the reply, yes I think you are right, if 13 electrons filled the first s p d orbits then 2 in s, 6 in p and 5 in d, so he has said it's the d orbit we want. No idea how he got the n and l values with that info, pretty sure he wants us (somehow) to do it though.

thanks for the reply!

edit think it's something to do with that for 1s2 n=0 l=0, for 1p6 n=0 l=1 for 1d10 n=0 l=2 etc etc
 
I'll update this for anyone else who has this problem in future.

You would be given

IUQpHGB.jpg


You have electronic structure of SPDSPF...

So for example if you have 1s2 1p6 1d10 (which is 18 electrons), you start with the LOWEST number for beta from the chart for 1s2, then the next lowest for 1p6, then the next lowest for 1d10. So for 1s2 1p6 1d10 you would be at n=0 l=2. BUT be careful if you had a longer configuration (i.e. more electrons) the next beta value would be 39.5 and so l=0 n=1. NOT l=3 n=0. This is where I was getting mixed up.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top