gazzo
- 174
- 0
Let X,Y be two spaces, A a closed subset of X, f:A--->Y a continuous map. We denote by X\cup_fY the quotient space of the disjoint union X\oplus{Y} by the equivalence relation ~ generated by a ~ f(a) for all a in A. This space is called teh attachment of X with Y along A via f.
i) If A is a strong deformation retract of X, show that Y is a deformation retract of X\cup_fY.
ii) The map f is extendable to a continuous map F:X-->Y if and only if Y is a retract of X\cup_fY.
I'm really stuck on this question. If A is a strong deformation retract of X, then we have some homotopy H:X\times[0,1]\rightarrowX where for all x in X, H(x,0) = x. H(x,1) is in A. and for all b in A and all t in [0,1], H(a,t) = a.
But what has that got to do with X\cup_fY?
Are the members of X\cup_fY the equivalence classes where for a~b if one of: a = b, f(a)=f(b), a is in A and b=f(u) in Y.
So we want to come up with a map \varphi:X\cup_fY\rightarrow{Y} where for all y in Y, \varphi(y) = y.
i) If A is a strong deformation retract of X, show that Y is a deformation retract of X\cup_fY.
ii) The map f is extendable to a continuous map F:X-->Y if and only if Y is a retract of X\cup_fY.
I'm really stuck on this question. If A is a strong deformation retract of X, then we have some homotopy H:X\times[0,1]\rightarrowX where for all x in X, H(x,0) = x. H(x,1) is in A. and for all b in A and all t in [0,1], H(a,t) = a.
But what has that got to do with X\cup_fY?
Are the members of X\cup_fY the equivalence classes where for a~b if one of: a = b, f(a)=f(b), a is in A and b=f(u) in Y.
So we want to come up with a map \varphi:X\cup_fY\rightarrow{Y} where for all y in Y, \varphi(y) = y.
