How Do Quotient Spaces in Topology Relate to Attachments and Retractions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gazzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    quotient Topology
gazzo
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
Let X,Y be two spaces, A a closed subset of X, f:A--->Y a continuous map. We denote by X\cup_fY the quotient space of the disjoint union X\oplus{Y} by the equivalence relation ~ generated by a ~ f(a) for all a in A. This space is called teh attachment of X with Y along A via f.

i) If A is a strong deformation retract of X, show that Y is a deformation retract of X\cup_fY.

ii) The map f is extendable to a continuous map F:X-->Y if and only if Y is a retract of X\cup_fY.

I'm really stuck on this question. If A is a strong deformation retract of X, then we have some homotopy H:X\times[0,1]\rightarrowX where for all x in X, H(x,0) = x. H(x,1) is in A. and for all b in A and all t in [0,1], H(a,t) = a.

But what has that got to do with X\cup_fY?

Are the members of X\cup_fY the equivalence classes where for a~b if one of: a = b, f(a)=f(b), a is in A and b=f(u) in Y.

So we want to come up with a map \varphi:X\cup_fY\rightarrow{Y} where for all y in Y, \varphi(y) = y. :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Things in the attachment are things in X or Y but where we identify an element in A with its image. Example: X=Y= a disc A is the boundary of X and f is an isomorphism onto the boudary of Y. The attachment is then two discs identified along their boundary, ie a sphere.

now imagine X is a punctured disc, so it is strongly homotopic to its boundary, S^1. Then it is clear that the join along the boundary is now a punctured sphere, and that this is homotopy equivalent to the disc Y, and that this homotopy can just be taken by extending the strong homotopy of X to its boundary by making it the identity on Y.
 
Last edited:
hmm thanks a lot Matt I think I've got it.
 
topology is/was for me very frustrating. the results in it are easily seen to be true but it is always hard to write down the proofs because they are so fiddly. take for instance the proof that the fundamental group is indeed a group (associativity of loops) and independent of base point (in a path connected space). try to think of an easy example. at least you will be able to desribe that so that your teachers understand you understand what is going on.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top