How do spherical coordinates work for finding volume in a given region?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the application of spherical coordinates in calculating volume for a specific region defined by the surfaces \(x^{2}+y^{2} = 3z^{2}\) and \(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2} = 4z\). Participants are exploring the implications of these surfaces and the corresponding limits for integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the interpretation of the "upper half" of the cone defined by \(x^{2}+y^{2} = 3z^{2}\) and discussing the implications of the negative values for \(\phi\) in spherical coordinates. There is also an exploration of how to determine the limits for \(\rho\) and the intersection of the two surfaces.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the surfaces and the intersections, while others are still grappling with the conversion between rectangular and spherical coordinates. There is an ongoing examination of the implications of the coordinate transformations and the limits of integration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that in spherical coordinates, \(\phi\) is typically constrained between \(0\) and \(\pi\), and there is a discussion about how to handle the intersections of the surfaces in both rectangular and spherical coordinates. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the ranges and the reasoning behind certain transformations.

mrcleanhands

Homework Statement


Find VR_{z}^{2} = \int \!\!\! \int \!\!\! \int_{E} (x^{2} + y^{2})dV given a constant density lying above upper half of x^{2}+y^{2} = 3z^{2} and below x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2} = 4z.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Why does it say upper half of x^{2}+y^{2} = 3z^{2}? It's not like there are two possible halves.

Here's what I've done so far but I'm a little unsure about some theory.
For x^{2}+y^{2} = 3z^{2}
\tan^{2}\phi = 3 which means \phi=\pm\frac{\pi}{3}

I've seen most questions don't actually have a - value for \phi because it only works in a range of 0 and \pi right? The movement itself is taken care of by \theta? So I can just get rid off that negative \frac{\pi}{3}?


For x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2} = 4z:
\rho=4cos\phi and then usually questions will say 0\leq\rho\leq4\cos\phi but I don't really know how we get it ranges from 0... ?

Assuming I did everything right I'll then get:
E=\{(r,\theta,\phi):0\leq\theta\leq2\pi,\, 0\leq\phi\leq\frac{\pi}{3},\, 0\leq \rho \leq4 \cos\phi\}

Which I then plug into an integral like this:

\int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{3}} \int_{0}^{4\cos\phi} (x^{2} + y^{2}) \,\rho^{2}\sin\phi d\rho d\phi d\theta
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mrcleanhands said:

Homework Statement


Find VR_{z}^{2} = \int \!\!\! \int \!\!\! \int_{E} (x^{2} + y^{2})dV given a constant density lying above upper half of x^{2}+y^{2} = 3z^{2} and below x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2} = 4z.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Why does it say upper half of x^{2}+y^{2} = 3z^{2}? It's not like there are two possible halves.
On the contrary, there are "two possible halves", z= \sqrt{(x^2+ y^2)/3} and z= -\sqrt{(x^2+ y^2)/3}. This is a cone with two nappes.

Here's what I've done so far but I'm a little unsure about some theory.
For x^{2}+y^{2} = 3z^{2}
\tan^{2}\phi = 3 which means \phi=\pm\frac{\pi}{3}

I've seen most questions don't actually have a - value for \phi because it only works in a range of 0 and \pi right? The movement itself is taken care of by \theta? So I can just get rid off that negative \frac{\pi}{3}?
What negative are you talking about? Yes, in spherical coordinates, \phi is always gbetween 0 and \pi. I don't see a problem with that.

For x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2} = 4z:
\rho=4cos\phi and then usually questions will say 0\leq\rho\leq4\cos\phi but I don't really know how we get it ranges from 0... ?
Where do the two surfaces, x^2+ y^2= 3z^2 (a cone) and x^2+ y^2+ z^2= 4z (a sphere with center at (0, 0, 2)) intersect? Subtracting the first from the second we have z^2= 4z- 3z^2 which reduces to z^2- z= z(z- 1)= 0[/tex].<br /> z= 1 gives. as you say, tan(\phi)= 3.<br /> <br /> [/quote]Assuming I did everything right I&#039;ll then get:<br /> E=\{(r,\theta,\phi):0\leq\theta\leq2\pi,\, 0\leq\phi\leq\frac{\pi}{3},\, 0\leq \rho \leq4 \cos\phi\} <br /> <br /> Which I then plug into an integral like this:<br /> <br /> \int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{3}} \int_{0}^{4\cos\phi} (x^{2} + y^{2}) \,\rho^{2}\sin\phi d\rho d\phi d\theta[/QUOTE]<br /> Why do you still have x^2+ y^2 after you have converted to spherical coordinates?
 
HallsofIvy said:
On the contrary, there are "two possible halves", z= \sqrt{(x^2+ y^2)/3} and z= -\sqrt{(x^2+ y^2)/3}. This is a cone with two nappes.

Cool, I see it now.

HallsofIvy said:
What negative are you talking about?

This.

x^{2}+y^{2}=3z^{2}
\rho^{2}\sin^{2}(\phi)\cos^{2}(\theta)+\rho^{2}\sin^{2}(\phi)\sin^{2}(\theta)=3\rho\cos^{2}(\phi)
\sin^{2}(\phi)=3\cos^{2}(\phi)
\tan^{2}\phi=3
\tan\phi=\pm\sqrt{3}
\phi=\pm\frac{\pi}{3}

HallsofIvy said:
Where do the two surfaces, x^2+ y^2= 3z^2 (a cone) and x^2+ y^2+ z^2= 4z (a sphere with center at (0, 0, 2)) intersect? Subtracting the first from the second we have z^2= 4z- 3z^2 which reduces to z^2- z= z(z- 1)= 0.
z= 1 gives. as you say, tan(\phi)= 3.
Ok. I see you've found the intersection using the rectangular coordinates.
Can't I do so in spherical co-ordinates?
Why am I only getting one of the intersections when I do it this way (spherical coordinates)? i.e. \phi=\pm\frac{\pi}{3} and not the 0.
Also why is z=1 the equivalent of \tan\phi = \pm\sqrt{3} ?
If I convert z=1 to spherical co-ordinates I get \rho\sin\phi=1 ... not sure how to convert the 1 to the spherical equivalent.
How did you get the centre of the sphere as (0,0,2)? The z on the other side of the equality has thrown me off a little.
HallsofIvy said:
\int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{3}} \int_{0}^{4\cos\phi} (x^{2} + y^{2}) \,\rho^{2}\sin\phi d\rho d\phi d\theta
Why do you still have x^2+ y^2 after you have converted to spherical coordinates?[/QUOTE]
Should be...

\int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{3}} \int_{0}^{4\cos\phi} (\rho^{2}\sin^{2}(\phi)) \,\rho^{2}\sin\phi d\rho d\phi d\theta
 
Last edited by a moderator:
bump^
 
mrcleanhands said:
Should be...

\int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{3}} \int_{0}^{4\cos\phi} (\rho^{2}\sin^{2}(\phi)) \,\rho^{2}\sin\phi d\rho d\phi d\theta

mrcleanhands said:
bump^

Why the bump? What's left to do?
 
Yeah, I don't really get why z=1 gives \tan\phi=\pm\sqrt{3} I can get this if I convert to spherical co-ordinates straight away but not by solving the intersection of the rectangular coordinates.

Also while there are no negative in spherical co-ordinate radians I get \phi=\pm\frac{pi}{3}
 
mrcleanhands said:
Yeah, I don't really get why z=1 gives \tan\phi=\pm\sqrt{3} I can get this if I convert to spherical co-ordinates straight away but not by solving the intersection of the rectangular coordinates.

Also while there are no negative in spherical co-ordinate radians I get \phi=\pm\frac{pi}{3}

In post #1 you have shown that ##\tan^2\phi = 3##, so ##\tan \phi = \pm\sqrt 3##. If you plug that into a calculator you get ##\phi = \pm \frac \pi 3##. Those are the principle values of the arctangent. But in spherical coordiantes you always want solutions between ##0## and ##\pi##. So if you want the bottom portion of the cone, you need the second quadrant value of ##\phi## whose tangent is ##-\sqrt 3##. That is ##\frac{2\pi} 3##. Of course, you don't need that for your problem because it is only concerned with the upper half of the cone.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K