How Do Spin and Polarization Relate to Photon States?

Pacopag
Messages
193
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I'm trying to derive the stefan-boltzman law by considering a box of photons (as in Landau and Lifgarbagez and other texts). At one point in the derivation we multiply the density of states by 2 in order to account for the two independent polarizations of a photon. But at what point do we account for the fact that the spin of the photon is 1, so we have the "three" independent spin states, -1, 0, and 1? Or is there a relationship between "spin" and "polarization" that no one told me about?

Homework Equations


The number of states with frequency between w and w+dw is
2 V d^3w \over (2\pi)^3
V is the volume of the box, the rest of the stuff is from the phase space volume element and
the factor 2 out front accounts for the two polarizations.

The Attempt at a Solution


I read an older post about helicity of a photon. The poster mentioned something about a photon not being found in a spin 0 state. I didn't fully understand what he/she was saying. But it made me think that maybe 'polarity' and 'spin' are the same thing for a photon, and that the two polarities just correspond to two of the allowed spins while the third possible spin is just forbidden for some reason.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I understand, what you say is correct..there are three helicity states corresponding to the three spin states of the photon...makes sense since helicity is the projection of the spin along the momentum...and spin projections 1,0 and -1 corresponds to value of projection along, say, the z axis...If you take momentum along the z axis, both helicity and spin should correspond to the same thing...polarizations, on the other hand, are some linear combinations of the helicities...

I think there is some constraint due to masslessness which makes it only two independent helicities (only the transverse ones) for the photon ... a massive spin 1 particle should have 3 degrees of freedom...

Maybe you can look at chapter 6 of the book Quarks and Leptons by Halzen and Martin...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top