How Do Symmetrical Base n and Base m Decimals Relate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmich79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base Mathematics
jmich79
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
When fractions F1 and F2 are written as base n decimals, F1=(.7373)base n and F2=(.3737)base n. In base m, F1=(.5252)base m and F2=(.2525) base m. Find (m+n). No trial and error please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Saying "F1= (.7373) base n" means F1= 7/n+ 3/n2+ 7/n3+ 3/n4. Similarly, saying "F1= (.5252) base m" means that F1= 5/m+ 2/m2+ 5/m3+ 2/m4. Putting those together you know that 7/n+ 3/n2+ 7/n3+ 3/n4= 5/m+ 2/m2+ 5/m3+ 2/m4. Likewise, F2= (.3737) base n and F2= (.2525) base m gives 3/n+ 7/n2+ 3/n3+ 7/n4= 2/m+ 5/m2+ 2/m3+ 5/m4. That gives you two equations to solve for the two unknown numbers m and n.

Edited to replace "y/n3" by "7/n3". My finger slipped!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
where are you getting y/n^3 from
I tried doing this method without the y variable and was not able to solve for it. I came up with some crazy nubers. Can you please explain further?
 
dOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO SOLVE THIS EQUATION SIMULTANEOUSLY?
 
It seems to me that you're supposed to spot the weird symmetry in the numbers here. '7373', '3737', '5252', '2525'. HallsofIvy outlines a general method of solving this problem when the given numbers have no special pattern, but fk only knows how you'd solve those simultaneous equations!

My thoughts. Try adding F1 and F2 in base m and in base n. Assume, just to make it easier, that n>10 and m>7 (if that's not the case I'm sure it'll turn up in some contradiction or other)


(eta: well, I'm not making much progress... but I still think that it's important to note the symmetry here. It means something, I'm sure of it.)
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top