How Do Trigonometric Identities Connect to Drawings?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dainy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the derivation of the trigonometric identity sin(y) + sin(x) = 2sin((x+y)/2)cos((x-y)/2). Participants clarify that the original equation presented is incorrect and provide the correct form of the identity. They emphasize the importance of using algebraic expansions and fundamental trigonometric identities to derive the formula. Additionally, the significance of visualizing these identities through drawings is highlighted, as it aids in grasping their meanings and relationships. Overall, a combination of algebra and geometric illustrations is essential for mastering trigonometric identities.
Dainy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
yes well I got the last problem...but I still want to have an idea were the identity siny+sinx=2sin(x+y)/2cos(x+y)/2 came from please someone sort of explain please! thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dainy said:
yes well I got the last problem...but I still want to have an idea were the identity siny+sinx=2sin(x+y)/2cos(x+y)/2 came from please someone sort of explain please! thanx
what you wrote is not an identity consider x=y=pi/2
sin pi/2+sin pi/2=2
2sin pi/2 cos pi/2=0
do you mean
\sin(y)+\sin(x)=2\cos(\frac{y-x}{2})\sin(\frac{y+x}{2})
if so
start on the left by writing
y=(y+x)/2+(y-x)/2
x=(y+x)/2-(y-x)/2
then expand using
sin(a+b)=sin(a)cos(b)+cos(a)sin(b)
and
sin(a-b)=sin(a)cos(b)-cos(a)sin(b)
add like terms
 
Last edited:
back to the root

Dainy:

Make sure that you understand why

cos(a-b) = cos(a) cos(b) + sin(a) sin(b)

and that you can illustrate the meaning of this formula with a drawing.

Many other formulas can be derived form the previous by algebra and by other simple trigonometric rules (likes cos(-b)=cos(b), sin(-b)=-sin(b), cos(pi-b)=-cos(b), ... all rules that can be illustrated by a drawing too.).

So the picture is: a few simple principles and definitions, enough algebra, and you are on your own.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top