How Do Two Explanations of Spatial Hole Burning Differ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two explanations of spatial hole burning in laser physics. The first explanation involves the formation of standing waves in a linear cavity, leading to gain depletion at the nodes of the wave pattern. The second explanation focuses on the saturation of gain in the medium corresponding to the TEM00 mode. Participants note that while both explanations address spatial hole burning, they highlight different aspects of how gain is affected in the medium. Understanding the relationship between standing wave nodes and anti-nodes is crucial for grasping the implications of both explanations.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am reading about spatial hole burning in the litterature, and I have come across two different explanations. I can't quite see how they relate to each other. Here they are:

1) In this explanation one uses the fact that in a linear cavity the optical field is a superposition of two counter-propagating waves such that they produce a standing wave in the medium. This will deplete the gain in all the nodes of the standing wave pattern.

2) In this explanation one simply says that e.g. TEM00 will saturate the gain in the medium in a TEM00-pattern.

As far as I can tell, these two explanations are not identical. Intuitively I would say the second one is the one that makes most sense, but the first one is mentioned in most books. Can someone shed some light on this matter?

Any help is appreciated.


Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there,
Was also looking for information on spatial hole burning. I how ever see a little rapport between the two explanations you provided.
In the first, the gain medium is linear and the waves traveling in opposite directions superpose to form standing waves. This causes depletion of the gain medium in all nodes of the standing wave. Right! But ask yourself what happens at the anti nodes?
Actually in standing waves, nodes are non vibrating points, so these parts of the gain medium are not seen by the laser light, there are wasted, so that the anti nodes on the other hand are much more busy or saturated if you want.
As for the TEM00 modes, I think since the number of the nodes depend on the wavelength, L=n\frac{\lambda}{2}, where L is the optical cavity length, some particular modes will be favored, in this case the fundamental mode of the laser.

That's about all I can say for now.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top