Courses How do 'unique' courses look on graduate applications?

AI Thread Summary
An independent study course in physics, particularly one tailored by a professor, can enhance a graduate school application, showcasing ambition and self-motivation. The course will focus on "Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei," indicating a rigorous academic challenge. While there may not be a formal course description or listing, the experience can still be valuable. A strong letter of recommendation from the professor can clarify the course's depth and rigor to admissions committees, emphasizing the skills gained through self-study. Overall, the independent study is viewed positively, provided the student performs well and effectively communicates the experience in their application.
Troponin
Messages
267
Reaction score
2
I'm wondering how I can expect the "course" I'm taking this summer to look on a graduate school application for physics? I put "course" in quotations because I'm the only one in the course, and it is kind of made up for me as sort of an independent study with a professor.

The professor will dictate the focus of the course, but he said to start reading "Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei" by Osterbrock.

My first thought was "Great! This will look really good on my application!"
But after thinking about it...there will really be no way for the schools to know exactly what the course involved. There will be no course description or even course listing in my University catalogue...so now I'm not so sure it will look like anything special. I'm curious to see how an independent study type class like I'll be taking this summer will look to grad programs in comparison to the research stuff and graduate courses. (I'm not sure of the listing on this course, but I think it will be listed as a 5000 level course, which is graduate or special permission undergraduate level at my University)

I get the impression from the professor that he is going to put me through a good deal of torment...so I'm hoping that the end result won't be a "meh...so he took a non-standard class...next applicant!" when grad admissions see the listing on my records. lol
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have the professor write a letter of recommendation for you. Then he can describe what you did. Assuming you do OK in it, of course...
 
I can't speak to how admissions officials will see it, but I think it shows that you are ambitious, driven, and self motivated. It takes a lot of discipline to self-study.
 
You'll have plenty of valid skills to talk about when it comes to graduate school, and that is very important.
 
Cool. I was hoping to hear answers along these lines. lol
It looks like it's going to be more work than the credit hours will show, so I hope I can show that on my applications.

I'll have the professor write a letter of recommendation (if I do well...), hopefully that will make it clear.

Thanks for the advice!
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top