How Do Units Determine Norm Values in Rings?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jupiter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring Units
Jupiter
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
How can I show that if
\frac{a}{a^2-2b^2},\frac{b}{a^2-2b^2}\in \mathbb{Z}

then a^2-2b^2=\pm 1?
If you care to see the whole problem, you can find it here:
http://www.math.rochester.edu/courses/236H/home/hw12.pdf
It's #4 part c.

BTW, why is the significance of this "norm map"? I tried to google it for fun, but couldn't find much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I got it! I needed part b. I was going about the problem the wrong way. Thanks anyway!
 


To show that a^2-2b^2=\pm 1, we can use the fact that the elements a and b are units in the ring \mathbb{Z}, which means they have multiplicative inverses. This means that there exist elements c and d such that ac=ca=1 and bd=db=1. We can then rewrite the given expressions as:

\frac{a}{a^2-2b^2} = \frac{1}{a-2b^2a} = c
\frac{b}{a^2-2b^2} = \frac{1}{a-2b^2a} = d

Multiplying these expressions together, we get:

\frac{ab}{(a^2-2b^2)^2} = cd

Since cd=1, we can rewrite this as:

\frac{ab}{(a^2-2b^2)^2} = 1

This can be rearranged to give us:

a^2-2b^2 = \pm 1

This shows that if the given expressions are elements of \mathbb{Z}, then a^2-2b^2 must equal \pm 1.

Now, for the significance of the "norm map", it is a function that maps elements of a ring to the set of integers. In this case, the norm map is defined as:

N(a+bi) = a^2-2b^2

This map helps us understand the structure of the ring \mathbb{Z} (the Gaussian integers, which are numbers of the form a+bi, where a and b are integers). By using the norm map, we can show that the elements a and b are units in the ring if and only if N(a+bi)=\pm 1. This is exactly what we showed above, which is why the norm map is significant in this problem.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top