How Do Volumes of Reactant Gases Compare to Product Gas in Ammonia Synthesis?

AI Thread Summary
In ammonia synthesis, the reaction 3H2 + N2 → 2NH3 indicates that three volumes of hydrogen and one volume of nitrogen yield two volumes of ammonia. To produce 2,000 L of ammonia, 3,000 L of hydrogen and 1,000 L of nitrogen are required. The question arises as to why the total volume of reactants exceeds the volume of the product, which is explained by the stoichiometry of the reaction. At standard temperature and pressure, one mole of gas occupies the same volume, leading to a reduction in total gas volume upon reaction. Thus, the reaction results in a net decrease in volume, confirming the textbook's accuracy.
ND3G
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Suppose that you want to prepare 2.00*10^3 L of ammonia gas, NH3 , from the reaction of hydrogen gas with nitrogen gas. What volume of hydrogen and nitrogen do you need? Assume that the temperature and pressure remain constant during the reaction.

3H2(g) + N2(g) -> 2 NH3(g)

V H2 = 2.00*10^3 L NH3 * (3 vol H2 / 2 vol NH3) = 3.00*10^3 L H2

V N2 = 2.00*10^3 L NH3 * (1 vol N2 / 2 vol NH3) = 1.00*10^3 L N2

Therefore, 3.00*10^3 L of hydrogen and 1.00*10^3 L of nitrogen is required to make 2.00*10^3 L of ammonia.


This is an example in my textbook. My question is: how is it that when 3000L of hydrogen and 1000L of nitrogen are combined it produces only 2000L of ammonia?

Is the question stated incorrectly, is it taking into account only one volume of ammonia produced, or does the chemical reaction between hydrogen and nitrogen produce a more closely condensed ammonia gas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ND3G said:
This is an example in my textbook. My question is: how is it that when 3000L of hydrogen and 1000L of nitrogen are combined it produces only 2000L of ammonia?

Your textbook is not wrong. If you look at the equation, four molecules on the left produce 2 molecules of ammonia. So, it makes sense that 4000L are required to produce 2000L of ammonia.
 
So, does a mole of ammonia, take up the same physical space as either a mole of hydrogen or nitrogen would on their own? By combining the two is the total volume of gases reduced?

3 vol H2 + 1 Vol N2 = 2 Vol NH3

3L H2 + 1L N2 = 2L NH3
 
Last edited:
At standard temperature and pressure, one mole of any gas will occupy the same volume (~22L I think). So yes, if the reaction was to work completely, then you would be left with a yield of half the volume of the gases you put in.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top