How do we know if electrons are spherical?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter exec
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Spherical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of subatomic particles, particularly electrons, as spherical objects in physics and chemistry. Participants explore the implications of this representation, the nature of shape at the quantum level, and the limitations of models used to describe atomic structures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the portrayal of particles as spheres is a simplification for ease of understanding and calculation.
  • Others argue that using shapes like cubes or other forms could be misleading and question why spheres are chosen as the default representation.
  • One participant posits that the sphere is the simplest symmetric 3D shape, which aids in simplifying calculations.
  • Another participant emphasizes that at the level of electrons and elementary particles, the concept of "shape" may not be applicable due to quantum indeterminacy.
  • It is proposed that electrons exist only at a point, and any perceived shape of protons and neutrons may arise from the arrangement of quarks, which also may not have a defined shape.
  • Some participants note that while atoms may not be literal spheres, their interactions can be modeled as such for practical purposes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of representing particles as spheres. There is no consensus on whether this representation is misleading or if it serves a practical purpose in scientific modeling.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of models in representing atomic and subatomic structures, particularly regarding the assumptions about shape and dimensionality at the quantum level.

exec
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
When we study physics or chemistry, we often see particles, atoms, neutrons, protons, electrons, etc being portrayed as little spheres.

But in fact, how do we know if they are spherical?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most aren't spherical, that's just a representation for simplicity.
 
Yeah but it's kind of misleading. A related question would be why the couldn't use cubes, diamonds, heart shapes instead universally. Note that this isn't a science question.
 
I don't know, but maybe sphere is considered the simplest symmetric 3D shape, which helps in making calculations less complex.

Mr V
 
In fact, at the level of electrons and other elementary particles, ibecause of quantum indeterminacy, it is wrong to use the concept of "shape" at all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: larsa
Yeah you right. It was my mistake. There is no notion of a definite shape at the level of electrons. It is all too complicated at that level.

Thanks
Mr V
 
In fact, we know with much certainty that electrons do not have shape at all. They exist only at a point. In fact, it could be quite possible that protons and neutrons only have a shape because they are made of three quarks that can't exist on top of one another. If we could only see a lone quark we may be able to see that the quarks exist only at a point as well. Then all shapes and volumes would be a manifestation of the repulsion between points.
 
exec said:
When we study physics or chemistry, we often see particles, atoms, neutrons, protons, electrons, etc being portrayed as little spheres.

But in fact, how do we know if they are spherical?
Being portrayed as spheres in diagrams does not indicate anything about their physical properties any more than being coloured blue with a black line around them.

The sphere is the symbol that requires the least description - needing only a radius - and is therefore the least misrepresentative. If they drew atoms as little cubes, then the first question asked would be "What's with the 8 pointy bits?"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: larsa
exec said:
When we study physics or chemistry, we often see particles, atoms, neutrons, protons, electrons, etc being portrayed as little spheres.

But in fact, how do we know if they are spherical?


Remember that our "atom" really is a model. We can't really see what they physically look like. We use a model to describe it.

If atoms weren't treatable as spheres, it would be because some part of their physicality sticks out more than some other part (say, taller than it is wide) - you would be able to "orient" an atom. Which you can't.

While atoms may not actually be little hard balls, their interaction with the world really is as if it were a sphere.

Subatomic particles OTOH, are points; they have no dimension. But they still interact with the world in a spherical manner (i.e. same in all orientations.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: larsa

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K