How Do You Apply Fourier Transform to sin(2t)/t?

CE Trainee
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
f(t) = (sin(2t))/t




Homework Equations





3. The Attempt at a Solution
I know that sin(t)/t has the Fourier transform pi(w). I'm just not sure how to apply that fact to this problem. Knowing that sin(t)/t --> pi(w), I reasoned that sin(2t)/t --> 2pi(2w). I'm almost certain this is incorrect. I arrived at this conclusion by noticing that if i multiplied the top and bottom of sin(2t)/t by 2, I would have a sinc function 2sinc(2t). Then I could use the property sin(t)/t --> pi(w). Am I anywhere close?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CE Trainee said:
1. Homework Statement
f(t) = (sin(2t))/t




Homework Equations





3. The Attempt at a Solution
I know that sin(t)/t has the Fourier transform pi(w). I'm just not sure how to apply that fact to this problem. Knowing that sin(t)/t --> pi(w), I reasoned that sin(2t)/t --> 2pi(2w). I'm almost certain this is incorrect. I arrived at this conclusion by noticing that if i multiplied the top and bottom of sin(2t)/t by 2, I would have a sinc function 2sinc(2t). Then I could use the property sin(t)/t --> pi(w). Am I anywhere close?

You have the right idea. Let's introduce the following notation:

h(t) = \frac{\sin(t)}{t}

and H(\omega) is the Fourier transform of h(t).

Notice that

h(2t) = \frac{\sin(2t)}{2t}

and so

f(t) = 2 h(2t) = \frac{\sin(2t)}{t}

Therefore you need to find the Fourier transform of 2 h(2t)[/tex].<br /> <br /> Now suppose I write<br /> <br /> g(t) = h(2t)<br /> <br /> and let G(\omega) denote the Fourier transform of g(t). Do you know (in general, not necessarily for a specific function) how G(\omega) can be expressed in terms of H(\omega)? If so, then you are essentially done, because<br /> <br /> \mathcal{F}(f(t)) = \mathcal{F}(2 h(2t)) = 2 \mathcal{F}(h(2t)) = 2 \mathcal{F}(g(t)) = 2 G(\omega)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top