How Do You Apply the kT>>hw Approximation in Van der Waals Interactions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter demonslayer79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximation
AI Thread Summary
The kT >> hw approximation is used in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics to simplify expressions involving the Boltzmann factor, particularly when the energy levels are much smaller than the thermal energy. In the context of the Van der Waals interaction problem, the expression can be rewritten using the identity Ln[x] = -Ln[1/x]. By applying the approximation, the term Exp[-hw/(kT)] can be neglected, leading to a simplified expression of hw/(2kT). This approach highlights the importance of validating approximations in calculations. Understanding this method aids in solving problems related to Van der Waals interactions effectively.
demonslayer79
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a problem on Van-der Walls interaction and was told in the hint of the problem to use the approximation kT>>hw to simplify

{-hw/(2kT)}-Ln[Exp[-hw/(kT)]-1]

I have no idea how to apply this approximation to simpify the problem.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you remember differential approximation? (Or taylor series?) If kT >> hw, then (hw / kT)^2 is going to be negligibly small...
 


The approximation kT>>hw is commonly used in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics to simplify equations involving the Boltzmann factor, which is given by Exp[-hw/(kT)]. This approximation is valid when the energy of the system, hw, is much smaller than the thermal energy, kT. In other words, the energy levels of the system are closely spaced compared to the thermal energy.

In your problem, you are asked to simplify the expression {-hw/(2kT)}-Ln[Exp[-hw/(kT)]-1] using this approximation. To do so, you can first rewrite the expression as {-hw/(2kT)}-Ln[1-Exp[-hw/(kT)]] using the identity Ln[x] = -Ln[1/x]. Then, using the approximation kT>>hw, we can neglect the term Exp[-hw/(kT)] in the denominator since it is much smaller than 1. This simplifies the expression to {-hw/(2kT)}-(-hw/(kT)) = -hw/(2kT) + hw/(kT) = hw/(2kT). Therefore, the simplified expression is just hw/(2kT).

I hope this helps with your problem on Van-der Walls interaction. Remember to always check the validity of an approximation before using it in your calculations. Good luck!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top