How Do You Balance Complex Redox Reactions?

AI Thread Summary
To balance the redox reaction H2O + I2 + OCl- → IO3- + Cl- + H3O, the user attempted to split it into half-reactions but encountered issues with the final equation. The half-reactions derived were I2 + 6H2O → 2IO3- + 10e- + 12H+ and OCl- + 2e- + 2H+ → Cl- + H2O. The user’s final attempt resulted in the equation 5OCl- + I2 + 2H+ + H2O → 2Cl- + 2IO3 + 12H+, which did not balance correctly. The discussion highlights the complexity of balancing redox reactions and the need for careful accounting of electrons and charges. Assistance is sought to resolve the balancing issue before the assignment deadline.
erjkism
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Balancing a Redox Reaction.. urgent

I have an assingment that is due tomorrow for my college chemistry class and i am stuck on the last problem. I need to balance the following redox reaction, but everytime i try it doesn't balance...

H2O +I2 + OCl- ? IO3- + Cl- + H3O

when i split it up into the half reactions i get
I2 + 6H20 ? 2IO3- + 10e- + 12H+
OCl- + 2e- + 2H+ ? Cl- + H2O
which adds up to be this

5OCl- + I2 + 2H+ + $H2O ? 2Cl- + 2IO3 + 12H+

i don't get why it doesn't work. can someone show me what to do?? i have already searched the internet for tutorials, and i think i am doing everything correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OH yea the question mark (?) is supposed to be an arrow

:approve:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top