How do you calculate a force of a object that is not accelerating

  • Thread starter Thread starter assuredlonewo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating Force
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force exerted on an object that is not accelerating, such as pushing against a wall, one cannot derive a formula but can only measure the force directly. In cases like a book resting on a table, the force can be calculated based on known values like gravitational acceleration. When pushing against a wall, the force can be measured using a scale placed between the hands and the wall. The discussion emphasizes that while some forces can be calculated, others require direct measurement. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately assessing forces in different scenarios.
assuredlonewo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I would like to know how to calculate the force of an object that is not accelerating, for example, If I were push on a wall, neither me or the wall would move because the net force would be zero, but how would I calculate the force if I am trying to put on the wall.(I do not want the net force)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Sometimes that type of force can be calculated (like the force between a book and a table on which it is sitting) and sometimes it can't. The force you described can't be calculated, only measured.
 
The force on a book on a table can be calculated because g (or G) was measured previously (historically).

If you push the wall by simply leaning on it, you can imagine replacing yourself by a leaning post of equal weight and calculate the horizontal component caused by gravity (the part touching the floor is a pivot point).
 
russ_watters said:
Welcome to PF.

Sometimes that type of force can be calculated (like the force between a book and a table on which it is sitting) and sometimes it can't. The force you described can't be calculated, only measured.

How can you measure it?
 
assuredlonewo said:
How can you measure it?
Place a scale between your hands and the wall.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top