How Do You Calculate Acceleration of Sliding Rocks on a Hill?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kar_04
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the acceleration of sliding rocks on a hill, first identify the forces acting on the rocks, including gravitational force and friction. When sliding up the hill, only kinetic friction applies, while static friction is relevant when the rocks are at rest. A free body diagram can help visualize these forces and their components. For part A, the acceleration can be determined using the net force equation, factoring in the hill's angle and the coefficients of friction. For part B, the same principles apply, but the direction of friction will change as the rocks slide down.
kar_04
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
help with physics question please

Some sliding rocks approach the base of a hill with a speed of 16 m/s. The hill rises at 40degrees above the horizontal and has coefficients of kinetic and static friction of .420 & .610 respectively, with these rocks. A) find the acceleration of the rocks as they slide up the hill. B) if it slides down, find its acceleration on the way down

F=F(static) + F (kinetic)

i'm not sure how to approach this problem. I first tried finding the vector velocities but that didn't work too well...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What forces act on the rocks as they slide up the hill? (Don't add static and kinetic friction--in any given situation, only one acts.)
 
as they slide up it would be the applied force??..but I'm not sure how to find that
 
I see no mention of any applied force. What other forces act on the rocks?
 
as always try to draw a free body diagram
resolve the forces into proper components
then plug in your values
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top