How Do You Calculate Angular Acceleration and Time for a Turntable Platter?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angular acceleration of the pottery wheel, it is essential to recognize that both the small rubber wheel and the larger platter have the same angular acceleration due to the no-slip condition. The angular acceleration can be determined by the change in angular velocities over time. For the second part, since the acceleration is constant, the relationship ω = a*t can be used to find the time it takes for the platter to reach 33 1/3 rpm. Dimensional analysis may be necessary to convert units appropriately. Overall, understanding the relationship between the two wheels is key to solving the problem effectively.
oranrene
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


4. (9) On an old style record turntable a small rubber wheel is used to drive the larger platter. They are mounted so that their circular edges touch and do not slip while in motion. The small wheel has a radius of 2.0 cm and accelerates at the rate of 3.5 rad/s2 while it is in contact with the pottery wheel of radius 28.0 cm.
Find: a) the angular acceleration of the pottery wheel
b) the time it takes the turntable platter to reach 33 1/3 rpm



Homework Equations


v=rω
f=ω/2∏
t=1/f

The Attempt at a Solution



I honestly have no clue where to even begin. I have no clue how to set this up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The roll without slipping is all you really needed. It means the larger wheel spins as fast as the smaller wheel (as if they didn't, one would be slipping past the other).

This means their ANGULAR accelerations are both the same. The angular acceleration is just the change in their angular velocities (per unit time of course). That should answer the first part for you.

The second part is simple, since the acceleration is constant, the angular velocity will just be a a linear function of time.
ω=a*t (where a is the angular acceleration). All you have to do now is change the units (through dimensional analysis or whatever you like to call it).
 
vb2341 said:
The roll without slipping is all you really needed. It means the larger wheel spins as fast as the smaller wheel (as if they didn't, one would be slipping past the other).

This means their ANGULAR accelerations are both the same. The angular acceleration is just the change in their angular velocities (per unit time of course). That should answer the first part for you.

The second part is simple, since the acceleration is constant, the angular velocity will just be a a linear function of time.
ω=a*t (where a is the angular acceleration). All you have to do now is change the units (through dimensional analysis or whatever you like to call it).

Thankyou very much. I actually found an example in my book very similar to this one (My teacher is very bad at changing questions -_-) and was able to figure it out. Your explanation was very helpful though thankyou.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top