How Do You Calculate Angular Acceleration for a Rotating Beam?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angular acceleration of a rotating beam, the moment of inertia (I) must be determined accurately. The initial calculation of I as 0.03564 kgm^2 was incorrect due to improper application of the moment of inertia formula for a continuous mass distribution. The correct approach involves using the integral formula I = ∫(r^2)dm for a solid beam. The net torque (Ʃτ) was calculated as 0.352 Nm, leading to an angular acceleration (α) of 9.88 rad/s^2, which was also incorrect due to the flawed moment of inertia. Accurate calculation of I is essential for determining the correct angular acceleration.
Bishop556
Messages
37
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



A uniform beam of mass m = 0.6 kg and length L = 0.3 m can rotate about an axle through its center. Four forces are acting on it as shown in the figure. Their magnitudes are F1 = 1.5 N, F2 = 1.5 N, F3 = 1.5 N and F4 = 1.5 N. F2 acts a distance d = 0.12 m from the center of mass.

oxnartum.fa1.PNG


What is the angular acceleration?

Homework Equations



I = Ʃmr^2
I = ∫(r^2)dm
α = Ʃτ/I

The Attempt at a Solution



I = (0.6 kg)(0.15 m)^2 +(0.6 kg)(0.12 m)^2 + (.6 kg)(0.15)^2 = 0.03564 kgm^2

Ʃτ = 0.225 + 0.127 = 0.352 Nm

α = 0.352/0.03564 = 9.88 rad/s^2

This is apparently the wrong answer and I don't know where I messed up. [STRIKE][/STRIKE]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bishop556 said:
I = Ʃmr^2
That formula is for an aggregate of point masses. For a continuous distribution of mass through a body, such as a solid bar, you need the integral formula below (or off-the-shelf solutions to it).
I = ∫(r^2)dm
 
Hi Bishop556! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
Bishop556 said:
I = (0.6 kg)(0.15 m)^2 +(0.6 kg)(0.12 m)^2 + (.6 kg)(0.15)^2 = 0.03564 kgm^2

The moment of inertia is a property of the body only

it is completely independent of the forces acting on it, or of their positions. :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top