How Do You Calculate Cam Dimensions for Optimal Rod Travel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chantry09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cam Dimensions
Chantry09
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Im trying to work out the dimensions of the offset on a cam for a project. I know the travel of rod c, as well as the length of the connecting rod b, but I am not sure what the lenth of dimension a should be. I know this is probably simple maths (just pythagoras?) but I need to make sure I get the full travel out of rod c with full 360 degree rotation on the axel.

It would normally be very simple (a = 0.5 x travel of rod c), but it is the fact that rod b is allowed to pivot around the joint to rod c makes it a bit more confusing.

n4zk7p.jpg
 

Attachments

  • untitled67.JPG
    untitled67.JPG
    9.7 KB · Views: 402
Mathematics news on Phys.org
c will be highest when a is pointing directly upward. At that position, the distance from the Axle to the tip of c is b+ c- a= 1.5- a. c will be lowest when a is pointing directly downward. At that position, the distance from the Axle to the tip of c is a+ b+ c= a+ 1.5. The distance between those, the "travel" is a+1.5- (1.5- a)= 2a. You want a equal to 1/2 the travel just as you said. The fact that b pivots changes the speed with which c travels but not the distance.
 
As long as the axel is in line with the piston, the cam "a" needs to be half the length of the travel desired at the piston. Therefore, since the cylinder travel is 3/4 units, the cam should be 3/8 units.

The Pythagorean theorem comes into play when the axel is NOT in line with the cylinder.
 
HallsofIvy said:
c will be highest when a is pointing directly upward.\

... unless the axle is not in line with the cylinder. In that case (in fact, in all cases), cylinder "C" will be highest when the pivot point connecting cam "A" and rod "B" is in a position such that the axle is directly between that pivot point and the joint between rod "B" and cylinder "C"
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top