How Do You Calculate Cooking Intensity from Cooling in an Oven Cycle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bacat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cooking Intensity
AI Thread Summary
To calculate cooking intensity during an oven cycle, the discussion focuses on integrating the heat from the cooling phase after heating and holding temperatures. The ramp-up phase is straightforward, using the area of a triangle for constant heating, while the holding phase involves a constant temperature of 300C. The cooling phase is modeled using Newton's Cooling Law, with a defined ambient temperature of 23C. The main challenge is integrating the cooling function to derive cooking intensity, P, from the temperature profile T(t). The conversation emphasizes the complexity of the relationship between the oven's temperature dynamics and the food's heating process.
Bacat
Messages
149
Reaction score
1
I have a block of food in an oven and I want to calculate the "cooking intensity" of the block during a controlled oven cycle. The cycle of the oven is that it heats at 5 degrees (C) per minute, holds the temperature at 300C for 1 hour, and then shuts off the oven to cool to room temperature. I define as "cooking" any temperature higher than 23C (room temperature). I use P for cooking intensity.

I am doing fine on the ramp-up and the hold. And I can use the heat equation to find the temperature of cooling at any time. But how do I integrate the total heat from the cooling function? I seem to be stuck on this point. Here's my work so far:

Ramping Up

For a constant heating rate r, this is just finding the area of a triangle. In this case, r = 5.

P=\int_0^t{rxdx}

Holding

In this case, T = 300.

P=\int_0^t{TdT}

Cooling

Newton's Cooling Law (using k to temporarily ignore A, m, c, and R):

T(t) = T_a + (T_0 - T_a)*e^{-kt}

In this case:
T_a = 23

Let k = 0.0035

I want to find P from T(t). Can I just integrate like this?

P = \int_0^t{T(t)dT}

Don't I need to take the derivative of T(t) first and add that under the integral?

And before anyone asks: no, this isn't homework. Really.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Should I ask the question in a different way? Or did Memorial Day just derail the forum? :)
 
Please help if you know the answer.
 
The concept here seems pretty odd to me because you're just calculating a temperature profile of the oven and not considering the heating of the food, so this doesn't have a whole lot to do with "cooking". The reality is that you always have a Newton's Law of cooling/heating scenario going on inside the oven between the oven and the food.

Anyway, being an engineer, I'd integrate numerically with Excel, so I can't help you do it with calculus...
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top