How Do You Calculate Displacement for an Irregular Cantilever Beam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter timmy996
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cantilever
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the displacement of an irregular cantilever beam, one must consider the beam's segmented structure, which includes horizontal and diagonal segments with varying moment of inertia. The procedure involves calculating flexure and deflection for each segment sequentially, starting from segment 2 and then segment 1, to determine the total deflection at point C. The curvature at point C is then used to find the tangent for segment 3, allowing for the calculation of deflection at point D. Integration of the moment-curvature relationship can still be applied, but the geometry of the beam must be accounted for in the calculations. Understanding the relationship between the segments and their respective moment of inertia is crucial for accurate displacement determination.
timmy996
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to figure out how to calculate displacement for an irregular cantilever beam, i.e. one that is not the normal straight-beam that you would see in a textbook.

Please see the attached image. If the left end is fixed, and I want to calculate the displacement of point A due to an applied force at that point, how would I go about it?

Are you still able to use M_x = EI * d^2y/dx^2 and solve for displacement by integrating? I am not exactly sure how the geometry of the weird bended shape comes into play. Thanks.

- T
 

Attachments

  • cannot-ilever.jpg
    cannot-ilever.jpg
    8.4 KB · Views: 497
Engineering news on Phys.org
The cantilever beam has three segments:
1) Horizontal segment with moment inertia I_1
2) Diagonal segment at middle with moment inertia I_2
3) Diagonal segment at end with moment inertia I_3

Note: I_2 is determined relative to global Y axis (not local Y axis). Thus, I_2>I_1 as illustrated. I_3 is not required for calculations; only its horizontal length is needed.

The beam has four points
A) At support
B) Right of segment 1
C) Right of segment 2
D) Right of segment 3

Procedure:
a) Calculate flexure and deflection over segment 2
b) Calculate flexure and deflection over segment 1
c) Add deflection 1 and 2 to give total deflection at point C
d) Determine curvature at point C
e) Determine tangent of segment 3, and thus deflection of segment 4
f) Add deflection of point step (c) to setup (e) to yield total deflection at (4)
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top