How Do You Calculate Incremental Axial Stress in a Preloaded Elastic Beam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter will4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Elastic
will4
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Seems that most of the textbooks are dealing with elastic beam calculations, where a beam is fixed from both ends and initially there is no axial stress or load applied.

My problem is different in a way that an elastic rectangular beam is fixed from both ends and it is under certain tensile load F (given). I know the bending deflection y in the center of the beam due to applied load in transverse direction (that load is not given).

The question is how to calculate an increment in axial stress by knowing the deflection y in the center of the beam that is generated by applying a load in transverse direction?

Given:
Dimension of the beam, L, h, w
Elastic modulus (both tensile and bending)
Initial axial load, F
Deflection in the center, y

Any help appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I recall correctly;
a) For a beam not under a preload, the top is in compression and the bottom in tension, and the middle fiber has no axial stress, when the beam is loaded tranversally.
b) Now apply a compressive force to both ends so that the bottom fibers have no axial stress, and the whole beam is in compression.

What would be the load on the top fiber? Would it be the compressive stress in a) plus that added in part b) .

As a side note, concrete beams are often preloaded in compression so that no part of the beam beam will ever (never) be in tension under a transverse load.

Hope that gets you started.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top