How do you calculate joules necessary to rotate an object?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5P@N
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Joules Rotate
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the energy required to rotate a 10 kg object from a 45-degree downward position to an upright position, one must consider both torque and gravitational force. The discussion clarifies the distinction between force (measured in Newtons) and energy (measured in Joules), emphasizing the need for a proper understanding of both concepts. The object’s length is specified as 1 meter, which is crucial for calculations involving torque. The approach may involve integrating sine functions across the rotation to account for the normal force. Overall, the focus is on determining the energy necessary for the rotational movement under the influence of gravity.
5P@N
Messages
58
Reaction score
3
NOTE: THIS IS NOT A HOMEWORK QUESTION!

I merely wish to know how to calculate the force necessary to rotate an object, say of 10 kg, from a certain downward diagonal direction of 45 degrees into an upright position considering only gravity.

I'll need to use some formula involving torque...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
5P@N said:
NOTE: THIS IS NOT A HOMEWORK QUESTION!

I merely wish to know how to calculate the force necessary to rotate an object, say of 10 kg, from a certain downward diagonal direction of 45 degrees into an upright position considering only gravity.

I'll need to use some formula involving torque...
Your post is not clear.

In the title, it says you want to calculate joules necessary to rotate an object. In the OP, it says you want to calculate the force necessary.

Joules are the units of energy or work. Force is measured in units of Newtons.

What do you want to know?
 
My bad. I've read the distinction between the two, but must have slipped.:rolleyes:
I want to know the energy, and so need to provide the dimension of the object: let's say it's 1 meter long.

I'm just making its characteristics up because I want to know the general approach that's necessary.

I'm thinking that I'll have to integrate sin all across its rotation to account for the normal force? Let's say the object starts at a diagonal downward position of 45 degrees.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top