How Do You Calculate Minimum Constant Acceleration for a Jumbo Jet Takeoff?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsnoob90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematic
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the minimum constant acceleration for a jumbo jet takeoff, the required speed is 240 km/hr over a runway length of 1.34 km. The formula used is a = vf^2 / (2 * Δx), resulting in an acceleration of approximately 21492.54 km/hr². The discussion highlights the need to convert this value into km/hr/s for clarity. The final solution was confirmed to be correct, emphasizing the importance of unit conversion and significant figures in calculations. The problem was ultimately resolved by the original poster.
Physicsnoob90
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I'm confuse by what the question is asking as far as the conversion (km/hr/s). Can any please help me?

Homework Statement



A jumbo jet must reach a speed of 240 km/hr on the runway for takeoff. What is the minimum constant acceleration (in km/hr/s) needed for takeoff from a 1.34 km runway? (3 sig fig)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



a=vf^2/2(Δx)

a=(240 km/hr)^2/2(1.34 km) = (57600 km^2/hr^2) / (2.68 km) = 21492.53731
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignore this question. Finally solved it!
 
Physicsnoob90 said:
I'm confuse by what the question is asking as far as the conversion (km/hr/s). Can any please help me?

Homework Statement



A jumbo jet must reach a speed of 240 km/hr on the runway for takeoff. What is the minimum constant acceleration (in km/hr/s) needed for takeoff from a 1.34 km runway? (3 sig fig)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



a=vf^2/2(Δx)

a=(240 km/hr)^2/2(1.34 km) = (57600 km^2/hr^2) / (2.68 km) = 21492.53731

Your answer is correct, in ##km/hr^2##!...you want to convert units?...

$$21492.53731\frac{km}{hr^2}=21492.53731\frac{km}{hr^2}*\frac{1 hr}{60 min}*\frac{1 min}{60 sec}=? \frac{km}{hr.sec}$$

Remember only three significant figures.

Edit : I guess you solved it!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top