How do you calculate moment of inertia for circle?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moment of inertia for a circle not at its center of gravity, one can use the parallel axis theorem, which allows for adjustments based on the axis of rotation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of defining the axis, typically the z-axis in two-dimensional space. The original poster expresses difficulty in applying information from a Wikipedia page on the topic, indicating confusion about reference points. Clarification is provided that while a circle has a centroid, it does not have a center of gravity in the traditional sense. Understanding these concepts is crucial for calculating the moment of inertia for complex shapes made of circles.
Josh The Cool
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Hey, not sure if this is the right place to post this, but here it goes. how do you calculate the moment of inertia for a circle that is not at its center of gravity. I am trying to find the moment of inertia for a complex shape made of many circles, and this seems like a good place to start. Forgive me if the answer is simple, because I have spent hours googling this question and have come up empty handed. I would greatly appreciate any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Around which axis? In general, with an integral, but sometimes there are some tricks to avoid this, like the parallel axis theorem.
 
This is in two dimensional space. So I think the z axis if I understand correctly.
Edit:
I also looked at that wiki page, but couldn't apply it in any useful way.
 
What is unclear about the Wikipedia page?
 
Are you thinking of a reference point in the plane of the circle but not at the center of the circle?

A circle is a purely geometric figure, and as such, has no cg. It does have centroid; is that what you have in mind?
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top