How Do You Calculate NaCH3COO Concentration and Predict pH at Equivalence Point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cvc121
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Titration
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the concentration of NaCH3COO, the moles of HCl at the equivalence point were determined to be 2.5 x 10^-3 mol, leading to a concentration of 0.07 M when considering the total volume. However, there was confusion regarding whether the question sought the initial concentration of NaCH3COO, suggesting a recalculation using only the volume of NaCH3COO used, resulting in 0.25 M. The theoretical pH at the equivalence point was calculated to be 2.96 based on the dissociation of acetic acid, using a pKa of 4.756. Participants noted that the question's phrasing was unclear and may not accurately reflect standard titration practices.
cvc121
Messages
61
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


a) Determine the concentration of NaCH3COO. The volume of HCl used to reach the equivalence point is 25.05 mL, the concentration of HCl is 0.10 M, and the volume of NaCH3COO solution used is 10.0 mL.

b) Using the initial concentrations of NaCH3COO and HCl, and a reliable literature value for the pKb for NaCH3COO or PKa for CH3COOH, predict the theoretical pH of the equivalence point.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Here is my reasoning and calculations:

a)

The equivalence point is the point in the titration when the number of moles of a standard solution (titrant) is equal to the number of moles of a solution of unknown concentration (analyte).

Therefore, at the equivalence point:

ntitrant = nanalyte

nHCl = nNaCH3COO

moles of HCl = (concentration)(volume)

moles of HCl = (0.10 M)(0.02505 L)

moles of HCl = 2.5 x 10-3 mol

moles of HCl = moles of NaCH3COO = 2.5 x 10-3 molConcentration of NaCH3COO = moles / total volume

Concentration of NaCH3COO = 2.5 x 10-3 mol / (0.01 L + 0.02505 L)

Concentration of NaCH3COO = 0.07 M

b)

A reliable literature value for the pKa for acetic acid is 4.756.

pKa = -log Ka

Ka = 10-pKa

Ka = 10-4.756

Ka = 1.754 x 10-5

At the equivalence point of the titration of a weak base with a strong acid, the general reaction H3O+ (aq) + B (aq) ---> BH+ (aq) + H2O (l) has gone approximately to completion. Therefore, approximately all sodium acetate (NaCH3COO) will be converted to its conjugate acid, acetic acid (CH3COOH), in a 1:1 molar ratio.

Ka = [CH3COO-][H3O+] / [CH3COOH]
1.754 x 10-5 = x2 / (0.07 M – x)

Ka is very small. Therefore, the x value in the denominator is negligible and can be omitted.

1.754 x 10-5 = x2 / 0.07 M

x2 = (1.754 x 10-5 )(0.07 M)

x2 = 1.228 x 10-6 M

x = 1.108 x 10-3 M

[H3O+] = x = 1.108 x 10-3 M

Validity check:
(1.108 x 10-3 M / 0.07 M )(100%) = 1.58%

Theoretical pH = -log[H3O+]
Theoretical pH = -log[1.108 x 10-3]
Theoretical pH = 2.96

Could anyone verify my reasoning and calculations? Thanks. All help is very much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no CH3COONa at the endpoint so your calculation of concentration (using total volume at the endpoint) doesn't make much sense. Question most likely asks for the initial CH3COONa concentration.

b looks reasonalby accurate.

Question is a bit idiotic to be honest. Good luck detecting the end point in this titration (not your fault though).

acetate_titrated_with_hydrochloric_acid.png
 
Thank you for your response. Assuming that the question is asking for the initial concentration of CH3COONa, does the question provide enough information to solve for this? Would I simply use the volume of CH3COONa used instead of the total volume?

Concentration of NaCH3COO = 2.5 x 10-3 mol / 0.01 L = 0.25 M?
 
Looks OK.
 
I concur with BoreK that the question does not make a lot of sense. Are you sure you have copied it and any background out exactly? One titrates an acid with a base or vice versa;, one does not titrate a salt which is what sodium acetate is.

Your calculation in #1 is just giving you the pH of 0.07 M acetic acid.

Maybe that was not the question but until we know exactly what it was it is not really worth further thought
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top