How Do You Calculate Photon Flux from Apparent Magnitude?

  • Thread starter Thread starter roman93
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the photon flux from an object with an apparent magnitude of 31, the flux was determined to be approximately 1.02 x 10^-20 W/m². The typical optical wavelength used for calculations was chosen as 570 nm, leading to an energy per photon of about 3.49 x 10^-19 J. Dividing the calculated flux by the energy per photon resulted in a photon count of approximately 0.03 photons per unit time per unit area, indicating the source's faintness. The discussion highlighted the importance of accurately calculating flux and energy to understand photon flux. The calculations confirmed the extremely low photon count, consistent with the object's faintness.
roman93
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The faintest objects that have been detected at optical wavelengths with the Hubble
Space Telescope have apparent magnitudes m  31. Calculate the flux from
an object of this magnitude, and, assuming that each photon has a typical optical
wavelength, convert your result into the number of photons per unit time per unit
area at Earth (this is the so-called photon flux).
[The Sun has apparent magnitude m = -26.8, the flux from the Sun is 1350Wm^-2]


Homework Equations


m_2 - m_1 = 2.5log( f_1/f_2) log with base 10 here

E = hf, λ = c/f


The Attempt at a Solution



well I worked out the flux of the object to be 1.02*10^-20 Wm^-2. (I'm pretty sure this is right) however I am not sure what the typical optical wavelength is or how to go about working out the "Photon Flux".

I thought if I could work out the energy of a photon with typical wavelength, I can then divide the calculated flux by energy of photon which will give me the number of photons...
I am not sure how I work out the number of photons per unit time though =/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Typical optical wavelength would be those of visible light.
 
typical optical wavelength just means a wavelength somewhere in the visible spectrum

since the visible spectrum goes from 390nm to 750nm, looks like 570nm would be a good choice, it's right in the middle

and so using that, you should be able to figure out the typical energy per photon

if you have

\frac{energy}{photon}

and

\frac{energy}{seconds*area}

then how would you get

\frac{photon}{seconds*area}
 
SHISHKABOB said:
typical optical wavelength just means a wavelength somewhere in the visible spectrum

since the visible spectrum goes from 390nm to 750nm, looks like 570nm would be a good choice, it's right in the middle

and so using that, you should be able to figure out the typical energy per photon

if you have

\frac{energy}{photon}

and

\frac{energy}{seconds*area}

then how would you get

\frac{photon}{seconds*area}

guess I just divide one by the other. How do I work out the energy given the flux? (The total energy would be luminosity right?) if so the formula f = L / 4(pi)d^2 is the diameter the object receiving or the one emitting?
 
roman93 said:
How do I work out the energy given the flux?

Energy of what, and, more importantly, what for?
 
flux *is* energy

watts per unit area is energy per unit time per unit area

the flux tells you how much energy is moving through a surface per unit time
 
SHISHKABOB said:
flux *is* energy

watts per unit area is energy per unit time per unit area

the flux tells you how much energy is moving through a surface per unit time

Oh perhaps... I calculated the flux wrong then. Because using a wavelength of 570nm I get the energy per photon to be higher than the flux. so surely I can't have almost 0 photons reaching earth?
 
voko said:
Energy of what, and, more importantly, what for?

can you check that I have calculated the flux right?

m_1 = 31, m_2 = -26.8, f_1 = ? and f_2 = 1350.

31+26.8 = -2.5log(f_1 / 1350) so

10^(-57.8/2.5) = f_1/ 1350 so f_1 = 1350*10^(-57.8/2.5)
 
roman93 said:
so surely I can't have almost 0 photons reaching earth?

Almost is subjective. Your flux seems correct.
 
  • #10
voko said:
Almost is subjective. Your flux seems correct.

okay E = hc/λ. so using a wavelength of 570nm I get that E = 3.49*10^-19 J.

so the number of photons = (1.02*10^-20)/3.49*10^-19 which is 0.03...

I think somewhere I went wrong but can't figure out where?
 
  • #11
It is indeed a very small number, that's why the source is considered very faint.
 
  • #12
voko said:
It is indeed a very small number, that's why the source is considered very faint.

Ah okay, thank you both very much for your help!
 
Back
Top