How Do You Calculate Spring Constant in a Rotating System with a Broken Thread?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the spring constant k in a rotating system after a thread breaks. The initial solution presented involves equating kinetic energies before and after the thread is cut, but the teacher argues that energy is not conserved due to external forces and that an integral approach is necessary. The correct method involves considering the system from a rotating coordinate frame, where fictitious forces and potential energy must be accounted for. The total effective potential combines the spring's potential energy and the centrifugal potential energy. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining the spring constant in this scenario.
Adel A
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(Sorry for my bad English)
A slippery (frictionless), light horizontal bar rotates about a vertical axis with a constant angular velocity ω. A cylinder with mass m, is initially attatched to a thread with length a and to a spring, which from the beginning has its "natural" length.
Suddenly the thread breaks. Now the maximum distance between the cylinder and the axis is b.
Determine the spring constant k for the spring.

I have uploaded a picture of the problem.

Thanks!

Homework Equations


* T = m*(v^2)*1/2
* -0.5⋅k⋅r^2
* An integration

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the correct answer by the following equation, but my teacher says that the "procedure" is wrong. The solution involves an integral.

Here is my solution:

In the beginning (when the thread is not cut), the cylinder only has the kinetic energy: T1 = 0.5⋅m(ω⋅a)^2.

When the thread is cut, the cylinder is rotating with a new radius, b, thus the new kinetic energy is T2= 0.5⋅m(ω⋅b)^2. However, since the thread is cut, the spring makes the energy: -0.5⋅k⋅(b-a)^2.
At this stage, the energy is: T2 + the energy from the spring = 0.5⋅m(ω⋅b)^2 - 0.5⋅k⋅(b-a)^2.

Then I set the energy from the first stage equal to the energy from the second stage:

0.5⋅m(ω⋅a)^2 = 0.5⋅m(ω⋅b)^2 -0.5⋅k⋅(b-a)^2.

I solved for k, and got the correct answer:
k = (m⋅(ω^2)⋅(b + a))/(b - a).

My teacher said that the procedure is wrong. He said:
⋅The energy is not preserved (as I have assumed).
⋅There should be an integration involved.
⋅The work from the spring is negative.
⋅The Kinetic energy increases.

Another teacher said:
⋅We have an external force which rotates the axis. The energy is not preserved.
He showed me this integral, which is not complete:

∫m⋅r⋅(ω^2) - k⋅(...) dr = 0

I don't know how to solve this problem, and I really need some help.
Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • Bild 2015-03-17 kl. 13.49.jpg
    Bild 2015-03-17 kl. 13.49.jpg
    17.6 KB · Views: 536
Physics news on Phys.org
I am sorry for your teacher, but he is wrong. Your solution does make sense, but perhaps not in exactly the way you imagine it.

The first thing you need to do is to decide whether to consider the system from the fixed coordinate system or from a coordinate system that rotates with the bar. This is going to determine what "energy" means (note that energy is not independent of the reference frame). Your choice essentially corresponds to choosing a coordinate system that rotates with the bar. In this system there is a fictitious centrifugal force with a corresponding potential energy, which decreases as the cylinder travels outwards. This energy is essentially what you have called the "kinetic energy" of the cylinder (the cylinder also has a kinetic energy due to its radial movement, but you are looking for a point where this is zero). The total effective potential in this rotating system (which only has one degree of freedom) is the sum of the potential stored in the spring and the effective potential from the centrifugal force. Setting the potential at ##b## equal to the original potential at ##a## will give you the turning point as in any one-dimensional potential.

What your teacher's integral is doing is simply computing the potentials as the integral of the forces.
 
  • Like
Likes Adel A and Chestermiller
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top