How Do You Calculate the Angle Theta1 for Equilibrium in a Two-Cable System?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angle Theta1 in a two-cable system supporting a 600 N weight, the equilibrium conditions require that the sum of forces in both the x and y directions equals zero. The equations T1sin(Theta1) + T2sin(Theta2) = mg and T1cos(Theta1) = T2cos(Theta2) are used, where T1 and T2 are the tensions in the cables. The challenge arises from solving for the angles due to the complexity of the algebra involved. A suggested method is to square the tension equations and apply the identity sin^2(Theta) + cos^2(Theta) = 1 to simplify the problem. This approach effectively leads to a solution for Theta1.
wmrunner24
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hint: sin^2 \Theta + cos^2\Theta = 1 .
Consider the 600 N weight held by two
cables shown below. The left-hand cable had
tension 440 N and makes an angle of \Theta2 with
the ceiling. The right-hand cable had tension
480 N and makes an angle of \Theta1 with the
ceiling. What is the angle \Theta1 which the right-
hand cable makes with respect to the ceiling?
Answer in units of ◦.

Physics3.jpg


Homework Equations


\SigmaFx=0
\SigmaFy=0


The Attempt at a Solution



So, I understand all of the concepts perfectly well in order to complete this problem. The net force in both the x and y direction must be 0 in order for the system to remain at rest. Thus:

T1sin\Theta1+T2sin\Theta2=mg
T1cos\Theta1=T2cos\Theta2

In these two equations there are two unknowns: the two \Thetas. So, if I solve for one, I can find the other. However, the issue here is the algebra. I'm not sure how to solve when I have cosine nested in arcsine, and such. Usually, I would turn to my TI-89 Titanium to solve this but it freezes. So, how am I to proceed? Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For this equation

T1cosθ1=T2cosθ2

Try squaring both sides and then use the hint to get a new equation in terms of sine.
 
Genius. Worked great. Thanks a bunch.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top