How Do You Calculate the Capacitance of a Second Capacitor in Parallel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wushumaster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Voltage
AI Thread Summary
To find the capacitance of the second capacitor in parallel, first calculate the initial charge on the 100 pF capacitor using the formula Q = C × V, resulting in 5 nC. When connected in parallel with the second capacitor, the total charge remains the same, but the voltage drops to 35 V. The charge on the first capacitor at 35 V is 3.5 nC, indicating that the second capacitor must account for the difference in charge, which is 1.5 nC. Using the voltage across both capacitors, the capacitance of the second capacitor can be calculated as C = Q/V, yielding a capacitance of approximately 42.86 pF. The discussion emphasizes the principles of charge conservation and parallel capacitance calculations.
wushumaster
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A 100 pF capacitor is charged to a potential difference of 50 V, and the charging battery is disconnected. The
capacitor is then connected in parallel with a second (initially uncharged) capacitor. If the potential
difference across the first capacitor drops to 35 V, what is the capacitance of this second capacitor?

I am totally stuck! Please help! I know the voltage of both will be the same..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think the voltage across the first capacitor dropped from 50V to 35V?
 
I shall give you three hints.

1) Q\ =\ C\ \times\ V

2) For capacitors connected in parallel: C_{T}\ =\ C_{1}\ +\ C_{2}\ +\ C_{3}\ + ...

3) Charge is always conserved.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top