How Do You Calculate the Capacitance of C2 After Reconnection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter salman213
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors Voltage
AI Thread Summary
Two capacitors, C1 (60.0 nF) and C2, were initially connected in parallel to a 12.0 V power supply and later reconnected with opposite terminals. After reconnection, the voltage across C2 was measured at 4.00 V, indicating that C2 is less than C1. The charge conservation equation was applied, leading to the conclusion that after reconnection, the capacitors behave as if in series, with the total charge being conserved. The calculations showed that the correct capacitance for C2 is +30 nF, highlighting the importance of correctly accounting for charge cancellation during reconnection. Understanding the behavior of capacitors in series and parallel configurations is crucial for accurate calculations.
salman213
Messages
301
Reaction score
1
1. Two capacitors, C1 = 60.0 nF and C2, were connected in parallel with a power supply with E = 12.0 V. The two capacitors were then disconnected from the power supply and from each other and were reconnected with the positive terminal of one connected to the negative terminal of the other capacitor. After reconnection, the voltage across C2 was 4.00 V. C2 is less than C1.
Calculate C2







3. well originally it says they are in parallel
so

q1 = 60*12
q2 = C2*12

After reconnection
q1+q2 = q1' + q2'

q1' = q2' ? because they are in series? ... if i use this i get the wrong answer
but if i use this

q1+q2 = q1' + q2'
60*12 + c2*12 = 60*8 + c2*4

8 because still basically the remaining voltage should be across the other capictor (since I am thinking they are in series)

I solve for C2 = and i get the NEGATIVE RIGTH answer -30nF..while answer is +30nF

Help !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After the capacitors are reconnected to each other, they will be in parallel, and so the potential difference across each will be the same (4V).


Also, when using the charge formula

q1 + q2 = q1' + q2'

if q1 is positive, then q2 will be negative (because you're connecting the positive plate of one capacitor to the negative plate of the other, and vice versa). By connecting the plates together like this, there will be some cancellation of the charges, and after connection q1' and q2' will both be positive (since q1 is positive and larger in magnitude than q2, the 'leftover' charge after cancellation that is shared between the plates will be positive).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top