How Do You Calculate the Electric Field at a Point Near a Uniformly Charged Rod?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field at point P near a uniformly charged rod, the linear charge density (Lambda) is determined by dividing the total charge (-q) by the length (L) of the rod. The electric field contribution from each infinitesimal charge element (dq) is given by the equation dE = dq/(4*pi*E0*r^2), where r is the distance from dq to point P. The total electric field is found by integrating this expression from 0 to L, taking into account the distance a from the rod to point P. The challenge lies in correctly defining r, which should be expressed as r = a + x, where x is the variable of integration along the rod. This integration approach allows for the accurate calculation of the electric field at point P.
deadpenguins
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A nonconducting rod of length L = 8.15cm has charge -q = -4.23 fC uniformly distributed along its length. What are the magnitude and direction [relative to the positive direction of the x axis] of the electric field produced at point P, a distance a = 12.0cm from the rod?

NOTE: In the illustration, the rod and P are along the x axis, and P is to the right of the rod (assumed to be the positive end).


Homework Equations


dE = dq/(4*pi*E0*r2)
dq = Lambda*dx
E0 = permeativity of free space = 8.85x10-12
Lambda = linear charge density = q/L


The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure how 'L' and 'a' are to replace 'r' in the equation above. I have tried r = L + a, but it seems this method does not correctly describe the situation. I then tried to integrate the equation along the limits from 0 to L, but am not sure how to include the additional distance of 'a' into the equation. This seems like a fairly simple question, but my text does not extensively pursue this topic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what you have to compute is \int_0^L \frac {dq} { 4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2}

where r = the distance from the charge element dq to the point P
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top