How Do You Calculate the Elongation of a Spring Stretched at Both Ends?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bgq
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the elongation of a spring stretched at both ends by forces F1 and F2, the forces cannot simply be added together, especially if they are unequal, as this would cause the spring to accelerate towards the larger force. At equilibrium, if F1 equals F2, the elongation can be determined using x = F/k, where F is the force applied. The average tension across the spring must be considered, especially in cases where forces act in opposite directions. For example, if one end of the spring experiences a force of 10 Newtons and the other end 20 Newtons, the average tension is calculated as (20 - 10)/2, resulting in 5 Newtons. Understanding the direction and magnitude of forces is crucial for accurate elongation or compression calculations.
bgq
Messages
162
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Consider a spring of stiffness k and mass m. If we stretch - simultaneously - both ends of the spring by force F1 and F2. What will be the elongation of the spring? Can I add the forces and say that
x = (F1 + F2)/k ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bgq said:
Hi,

Consider a spring of stiffness k and mass m. If we stretch - simultaneously - both ends of the spring by force F1 and F2. What will be the elongation of the spring? Can I add the forces and say that
x = (F1 + F2)/k ?

No, you can't add the forces. If the forces are unequal, the spring itself will start to accelarate in the direction of the largest force. F = ma applies here, where F is the net force.

To stretch a spring, you always have to exert a force on both sides. Even if you tie the spring to an unmoveable object, the object will still exert the same force on one side of the spring, as the force on the other side, because the spring now can't move, so the net force on it has to be 0
 
willem2 said:
No, you can't add the forces. If the forces are unequal, the spring itself will start to accelarate in the direction of the largest force. F = ma applies here, where F is the net force.

To stretch a spring, you always have to exert a force on both sides. Even if you tie the spring to an unmoveable object, the object will still exert the same force on one side of the spring, as the force on the other side, because the spring now can't move, so the net force on it has to be 0

If it is at equilibrium so that F1 = F2 = F. Is elongation x = F/k or x = 2F/k?
 
bgq said:
If it is at equilibrium so that F1 = F2 = F.

When it is in equilibrium, F1 = F and F2 = -F.

Forces are vector quantities, they have magnitude and direction.

Is elongation x = F/k or x = 2F/k?

x = F/k. Adding two forces of magnitude "F" that act in different directions, to get "2F", is meaningless.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The spring may be compressed or elongated even if it is accelerating. My question is how to find the elongation or compression is such a situation.
 
bgq said:
The spring may be compressed or elongated even if it is accelerating. My question is how to find the elongation or compression is such a situation.

Take the average of the tension (or compression) force at the two ends and compute the amount of elongation or compression based on that.

For instance, consider a spring hanging from one end. The tension at the one end is mg. The tension at the other end is zero. So, on average the tension across the length of the spring is mg/2.

Be sure to watch your sign conventions. If a spring is being pushed from the back with a force of 10 Newtons and pulled from the front with a force of 20 Newtons, that's 20 minus 10 all divided by 2 for an average tension of 5 Newtons.

You can derive this result by treating the original spring as a bunch of smaller springs connected end-to-end and then adding up the displacements that result from the tension or compression experienced by each of the smaller springs.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
678
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top