How Do You Calculate the Gravitational Force on a 2 kg Mass?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the gravitational force on a 2 kg mass at the origin due to two other masses, the universal gravitational constant (6.6726 × 10^−11 N·m²/kg²) is essential. The masses are positioned at (4,2) for 5 kg and (1,-3) for 6 kg. A step-by-step approach is required to determine the net gravitational force, including calculating the individual forces exerted by each mass on the 2 kg mass. The initial attempt yielded a result of 1.72e-9 N, which was incorrect, indicating a need for further calculation and clarification. Providing detailed work will help in resolving the issue effectively.
armanio99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three masses are arranged in the (x, y) plane
as shown. What is the magnitude of the resulting
force on the 2 kg mass at the origin? The
value of the universal gravitational constant
is 6.6726 × 10^−11 N · m^2/kg^2 .
Answer in units of N

2kg @ (0,0)
5kg @ (4,2)
6kg @ (1,-3)

Please show step by step.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I got 1.72e-9. But it was incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
armanio99 said:

Homework Statement



Three masses are arranged in the (x, y) plane
as shown. What is the magnitude of the resulting
force on the 2 kg mass at the origin? The
value of the universal gravitational constant
is 6.6726 × 10^−11 N · m^2/kg^2 .
Answer in units of N

2kg @ (0,0)
5kg @ (4,2)
6kg @ (1,-3)

Please show step by step.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I got 1.72e-9. But it was incorrect.

Hi armanio99, welcome to Physics Forums.

You'll have to show the work for your own attempt to solve the problem before we can know how to help you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top