How Do You Calculate the Heat Capacity of a Liquid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sasha1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the heat capacity of a liquid, the formula used is C = Q / (m * ΔT), where C is heat capacity, Q is the heat added, m is the mass of the liquid, and ΔT is the temperature change. In this case, 47.5 J of heat is added to 13.2 g of liquid, resulting in a temperature increase of 1.72 degrees Celsius. By substituting these values into the formula, the heat capacity can be determined. It's important to ensure that the units are consistent, as heat capacity is expressed in energy per mass per temperature change. This calculation illustrates the relationship between heat, mass, and temperature in determining the heat capacity of a liquid.
Sasha1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me with a chemistry ?

When 47.5 J of heat are added to 13.2 g of a liquid, its temperature raises by 1.72 degree Celsius. What is the heat capacity of the liquid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What equations combining amount of heat, amount of substance, heat capacity and temperature change do you know?
 


Look at the units of heat capacity. It's energy divided by mass and temperature. You have 3 numerical values provided in the problem statement. How would you combine them such that you achieve the units of heat capacity? Units tell you what to do.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top