How Do You Calculate the Mass of Each Gas Component in a Heated Mixture?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jacob87411
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Component Mixture
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass of each gas component in a heated mixture of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen, the ideal gas law (PV=NRT) can be applied, but the initial data is insufficient. The mixture's composition is given as 0.1 oxygen, 0.2 carbon dioxide, and 0.7 nitrogen, but it's unclear whether these values represent mass or molar ratios. The molar mass of the mixture can be calculated using the formula 0.7(28) + 0.2(44) + 0.1(32), which helps in determining the mass once the number of moles is known. However, without clarification on the ratios, the calculation remains ambiguous. Accurate mass determination requires more specific information regarding the ratios of the components.
Jacob87411
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
1. A mixture at T=300 K and P=100 kPa is made up of .1 oxygen, .2 carbon dioxide, and .7 Nitrogen. It is then heated to 300 kPa and 500 K. Find the mass of each component


I originally thought using PV=NRT, ideal gas but there doesn't seem to be enough givens. Can you also find the molar mass of the mixture by doing:

.7(28)+.2(44)+.1(32), so then you can find the mass of the component when you find the number of moles N but I am having problems doing that
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the question is incomplete. In addition, it's ambiguous, as it does not state whether .1, .2 and .7 are mass or molar (ie, volume) ratios (assuming they are ratios).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top