How Do You Calculate the Maximum Force on Stacked Blocks Without Slippage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Speedking96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the maximum horizontal force on stacked blocks without slippage, the static coefficient of friction between the masses must be considered. The acceleration of the system can be determined using the formula μg, yielding an acceleration of 4.23 m/s². The net force equations for the x-direction indicate that the applied force must overcome the frictional force to prevent slippage. The total force applied to the lower block should account for both the mass of the lower block and the friction from the upper block. Ultimately, the maximum force calculated is approximately 46.91 Newtons, factoring in both masses and their respective forces.
Speedking96
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two masses M1 = 4.00 kg and M2 = 7.10 kg are stacked on top of each other as shown in the figure. The static coefficient of friction between M1 and M2 is μs = 0.430. There is no friction between M2 and the surface below it.

What is the maximum horizontal force that can be applied to M2 without M1 sliding relative to M2?


Homework Equations



F=ma

Ffriction = μFnormal

The Attempt at a Solution



For the 4 kg box:

Fnet = ma
Ff=ma
μmg = ma

μg=a
(0.43)(9.81) = a = 4.23 m/s/s

I understand that this must be the acceleration for the whole system, but when I calculate the max force, do I do it for the whole system's mass or for the 7.10 kg box only? Why or why not?
 

Attachments

  • IMG.png
    IMG.png
    3.6 KB · Views: 488
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a free body diagram for the other box as well. Also, write the net force equations in the x and y directions.
 
physicsboy121 said:
Draw a free body diagram for the other box as well. Also, write the net force equations in the x and y directions.


For the y-direction:

∑forces = 0 ; since the object is not accelerating in that direction

For the x-direction:

Fnet= Fapp

Fapp=ma= (7.10)(4.23) = 16.88 Newtons

But, when we are applying the force to the lower box, aren't we essentially pushing the whole system? Therefore, shouldn't the mass of the whole system be considered?
 

Attachments

  • IMG2.png
    IMG2.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 466
You are missing one force on the FBD you just drew. And instead of F normal of the system, I suggest that you think it as F12 (i.e. force of mass 1 onto mass 2) Also the friction force on the FBD of your initial post should be pointing in the other direction.
 
physicsboy121 said:
You are missing one force on the FBD you just drew. And instead of F normal of the system, I suggest that you think it as F12 (i.e. force of mass 1 onto mass 2) Also the friction force on the FBD of your initial post should be pointing in the other direction.

Is it the static friction of the top box?
 
correct
 
physicsboy121 said:
correct


Fnet=ma
Fapp-Ff = ma

Fapp - μmg = ma

Fapp = ma + μmg

= (7.1)(4.23) + (0.43)(4)(9.81) = 46.91 Newtons ?
 
I don't know how to approach problems that deal with multiple masses. Frustrating.
 
Back
Top