How Do You Calculate the Net Charge in a Nonuniformly Charged Spherical Shell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PFStudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the net charge in a nonuniformly charged spherical shell with inner radius 4.0 cm and outer radius 6.0 cm, the charge density is given by ρ = b/r, where b = 3.0 μC/m². The approach involves integrating the charge over infinitesimally thin spherical shells from the inner to the outer radius, using the relationship dq = 4πrb dr. The total charge is found by evaluating the integral q = 2πb(r₂² - r₁²), resulting in a net charge of approximately 38 nC. The discussion also clarifies that the surface area times thickness does not equal the volume for the entire sphere, emphasizing the need for careful integration.
PFStudent
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



19. A nonconducting spherical shell, with an inner radius of 4.0 cm and an outer radius of 6.0 cm, has charge spread nonuniformly through its volume between its inner and outer surfaces. The volume charge density \rho is the charge per unit volume, with the unit coulomb per cubic meter. For this shell \rho = b/r, where r is the distance in meters from the center of the shell and b = 3.0 \mu C/m^2. What is the net charge in the shell.

Homework Equations



<br /> \vec{F}_{12} = \frac{k_{e}q_{1}q_{2}}{{r_{12}}^2}\hat{r}_{21}<br />

<br /> |\vec{F}_{12}| = \frac{k_{e}|q_{1}||q_{2}|}{{r_{12}}^2}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



This problem is unlike most problems I have solved before so I am not sure if my approach is correct.

From what was given in the problem I conclude the following equations.

V = Volume
A = Area

<br /> \rho = \frac{q}{V}<br />

<br /> \rho = \frac{b}{r}<br />

<br /> b = \frac{q}{A}<br />

Though, the problem mentions that the charge has spread nonuniformly through its volume between its inner and outer surfaces of the spheres.

I am unsure as to how I am supposed to use that to solve the problem.

I assume I can treat the inner and outer spheres: sphere_{1} and sphere_{2}; separately and use the previous equations to come up with,

<br /> \rho_{1} = \frac{q_{1}}{V_{1}}<br />

<br /> \rho_{2} = \frac{q_{2}}{V_{2}}<br />

Volume of a sphere is,

<br /> V = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3<br />

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

<br /> q_{1} = \left(\frac{4}{3} \pi r_{1}^3\right)\left(\frac{b}{r_{1}}\right)<br />

<br /> sig. fig. \equiv 2<br />

<br /> q_{1} = 20 nC<br />

<br /> q_{2} = \left(\frac{4}{3} \pi r_{2}^3\right)\left(\frac{b}{r_{2}}\right)<br />

<br /> sig. fig. \equiv 2<br />

<br /> q_{2} = 45 nC<br />

Although, the answers, q_{1} = 20 nC q_{2} = 45 nC. Are somewhat close to the book answer, they’re wrong. And because the problem asks for the net charge in the shell, I thought maybe I could take the average of these two figures and get the right answer, however (though it was close) it was still the wrong answer for the net charge in the shell.

Yea, so I am stuck on how to find the net charge in the shell.

Any help would be appreciated.

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
PFStudent said:
Though, the problem mentions that the charge has spread nonuniformly through its volume between its inner and outer surfaces of the spheres.

I am unsure as to how I am supposed to use that to solve the problem.

I assume I can treat the inner and outer spheres: sphere_{1} and sphere_{2}; separately and use the previous equations to come up with,


No. When you say

\rho = \frac{q}{V}

notice that \rho[/tex] changes as a function of r (\rho=\frac{b}{r}). So, you can&#039;t just find the total charge as \rho_{r_2} V_{r_2}, because then you&#039;re assuming that \rho is constant for the whole volume inside, which is not true.<br /> <br /> However, for an infinitesimally (ie, infinitely small) thin spherical shell of thickness dr at a distance of r from the center, what&#039;s the charge? Since the shell is infinitesimally thin, it&#039;s ok to assume that the charge density remains constant in this extremely small region. Now, add up the charges of all such infinitesimal shells from the inner to the outer radius. <br /> <br /> Are you familiar with integral calculus?
 
Last edited:
siddharth said:
No. When you say

\rho = \frac{q}{V}

notice that \rho[/tex] changes as a function of r (\rho=\frac{b}{r}). So, you can&#039;t just find the total charge as \rho_{r_2} V_{r_2}, because then you&#039;re assuming that \rho is constant for the whole volume inside, which is not true.<br />
<br /> <br /> Hey, <br /> <br /> Thanks for the information. <br /> <br /> Ok, so then,<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; q + C= \int dq&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> And for this problem,<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; q = \int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}} dq&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; \rho = \frac{q}{V}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; \rho = \frac{b}{r}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> Which is the same thing as, <br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; \rho(r) = \frac{b}{r}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> For now assume \rho is constant, and so therefore,<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; \overline{\rho} = \frac{\Delta q}{\Delta V}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> S.A. = Surface Area of Sphere<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; \overline{\rho} = \frac{\Delta q}{S.A.\Delta r}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; \overline{\rho}(r) = \frac{\Delta q}{S.A.(r)\Delta r}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; (4\pi r^2)\overline{\rho}(r) = \frac{\Delta q}{\Delta r}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; \lim_{\Delta r\rightarrow 0} (4\pi r^2)\overline{\rho}(r) = \lim_{\Delta r\rightarrow 0} \frac{\Delta q}{\Delta r}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; 4\pi r^2{\rho}(r) = \frac{dq}{dr}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; 4\pi r^2 \left(\frac{b}{r}\right)dr = dq&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; 4\pi rbdr = dq&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; dq = 4\pi brdr&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; \int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}} dq = 4\pi b\int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}}rdr&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; q = 2\pi b \left[r^2\right]_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; q = 2\pi b \left(r_{2}^2-r_{1}^2\right)&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; sig. fig. \equiv 2&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; q = 3.8{\textcolor[rgb]{1.00,1.00,1.00}{.}}x{\textcolor[rgb]{1.00,1.00,1.00}{.}}10^{-8}{\textcolor[rgb]{1.00,1.00,1.00}{.}}C&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; q = 38{\textcolor[rgb]{1.00,1.00,1.00}{.}}nC&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> Ok, I got the right answer however, I want to know if I derived the answer mathematically correct.<br /> <br /> For example is, S.A.(r)\Delta r = \Delta V?<br /> <br /> This reason, I ask is because if you let \Delta r = r<br /> <br /> Then you have, <br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; S.A.(r)r = V&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; (4 \pi r^2)r \neq \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; 4 \pi r^3 \neq \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> So how does that work?<br /> <br /> -PFStudent
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top